To the question of organization of communication infrastructural spatial systems of the region.

The Board of Directors of IDGC of Urals, JSC approved two Deputy General Directors.

In accordance with the decision of the Company's Board of Directors, Anton Dyachkov was appointed to the position of Deputy General Director for Investment Activities of OAO IDGC of Urals.

Anton Dyachkov joined IDGC of Urals in December 2015. In February 2016, he was appointed Acting Deputy General Director for Investment Activities of IDGC of Urals, JSC. On April 27, 2016, approved by the decision of the Board of Directors in his position.

Anton Dyachkov graduated from the Siberian State University telecommunications and informatics, specialty "Multichannel telecommunication systems".

Immediately after graduating from the university, Anton Dyachkov came to work in the energy industry. Until 2008, he carried out his activities in one of the divisions of OAO Novosibirskenergo, which was engaged in technological, information and telecommunications support for the work of energy enterprises. From 2008 to 2011, Anton Dyachkov worked in senior positions in large regional commercial companies in the field of telecommunications, industrial automation, engineering support and integrated solutions for enterprises various industries industry of the Siberian region. From 2011 to 2015, he headed the RusEnergoMir group of companies (Novosibirsk), which is one of the market leaders in the design and construction of power facilities with a voltage class of 0.4 to 750 kV. During 2015, Anton Dyachkov headed TelePosition Project (St. Petersburg), the first domestic industrial operator in the wireless telemetry and remote control market with its own scientific and production base. Since December 2015, Anton Dyachkov's career has been associated with the energy system of the Ural region.

The Board of Directors of IDGC of Urals, JSC also approved Alexander Krivyakov for the position of Deputy General Director of the company.

Alexander Krivyakov has been working at IDGC of Urals since December 2014. Previously, he oversaw security issues. After the appointment, Alexander will focus on coordinating interaction with authorities state power on the implementation of strategic programs and projects of IDGC of Urals, JSC, systematic work with various public organizations and the business community. Alexander Krivyakov has rich experience management activities and experience in government agencies.

Alexander Krivyakov is a native of the Sverdlovsk region. He graduated from the Ural Polytechnic Institute. CM. Kirov, specialty " Power stations". My labor activity Alexander Krivyakov started at the Ural aluminum smelter, where he worked in the field of energy profile. From 1983 to 2010, Alexander Krivyakov served in the KGB of the USSR, the FSB of Russia. For achieving high results in military service, he was awarded the Order of the Red Star, 15 medals, including the medal of the Republic of Afghanistan "For Courage", badges " Honorary Fellow counterintelligence", "For service in counterintelligence" III, II, I degree. He has the military rank of lieutenant general. After completing a career in the authorities state security Alexander Krivyakov supervised security issues in regional companies.

During his work at IDGC of Urals, Alexander Krivyakov has established himself as a high-class professional, including in protecting the interests of the company at various levels, has excellent analytical skills and a systematic approach to performing the most complex tasks.

Sergei Kuznetsov, who previously held the position of head of the security department, will act as the head of the security unit of IDGC of Urals, JSC.

DREGVAL Sergey Georgievich - CEO

Sergey Georgievich Dregval was born on September 21, 1971 in the city of Dzhankoy, Crimean region of the Ukrainian SSR. Has two higher technical educations. In 1996 he graduated from the Kyiv International University of Civil Aviation with a degree in Technical operation electrified and flight-navigation complexes aircraft". In 2005, he graduated from the Tyumen State Oil and Gas University with a degree in Electric Drive and Automation of Industrial Installations and Technological Complexes.

Sergey Dregval began his career in the energy sector as an electrician at an oil industry enterprise in Nizhnevartovsk, carrying out repairs oil wells, where he worked his way up to the position of Chief Power Engineer.

From 2003 to 2007 He was Deputy and then Head of the Energy Sales Service of Energoneft-Tomsk.

From 2007 to 2011 Sergey Dregval worked at the Tomsk Energy Retail Company, where he oversaw the main production unit - energy sales activities as Deputy General Director for the purchase and sale of electrical energy, and then as a commercial director of this company.

Since 2011, he was the first deputy managing director of OJSC Altaienergosbyt, later, Sergey Dregval headed the enterprise.

In 2013-2014, Sergey Dregval was the head of Oboronenergosbyt OJSC.

On October 28, 2014, in accordance with the decision of the Board of Directors of IDGC of Urals, JSC, Sergey Dregval began to work in the company.

On November 16, 2017, the Board of Directors of IDGC of Urals, JSC elected Sergey Dregval as General Director of the company for new term- from November 18, 2017 to November 17, 2022 inclusive.

BOLOTIN Vladimir Anatolyevich - First Deputy General Director - Chief Engineer

Vladimir Bolotin was born on March 2, 1975 in Miass, Chelyabinsk Region. Graduated from the Chelyabinsk State Technical University with a degree in Automatic control electric power systems" (1997) and South Ural State University, Mini - MBA/PRACTICE majoring in "Organization Management" (2010).

He began his career in 1995 as an electrician of the 2nd category in the Northern Electric Networks of OAO Tyumenenergo in the city of Tyumenenergo. New Urengoy. From 1996 to 2007, he worked his way up from an electrician of the 4th category to the deputy head of the relay protection service for electrical automation and electrical measurements of the Kogalym electrical networks of Tyumenenergo (Kogalym).

Vladimir Bolotin came to work at the Chelyabenergo branch in 2007 as a deputy technical director on operational and technological management. From 2007 to 2014, he worked as Deputy Chief Engineer for Operational and Technological Management - Head of the Grid Control Center of Chelyabenergo, a branch of OAO IDGC of the Urals. Vladimir Bolotin received management practice while working as Deputy General Director for Technical Issues - Chief Engineer of PJSC Tomsk Distribution Company. After returning to the Urals, since June 2015, he has been the Deputy Chief Engineer for Operations of IDGC of Urals, JSC in Yekaterinburg.

From October 2015 to November 2017, Vladimir Bolotin led the technical unit of Chelyabenergo, a branch of OAO IDGC of the Urals.

From November 23, 2017 to March 2, 2018, he served as First Deputy General Director - Chief Engineer of IDGC of Urals, JSC.

By the decision of the Board of Directors, from March 3, 2018, he began to fulfill his duties in the status of First Deputy General Director - Chief Engineer.

BONDARENKO Sergey Nikolaevich - Deputy General Director for Security

Sergei Bondarenko was born on April 2, 1973 in Moscow.

Graduated from two higher educational institutions. In 1996 - the Moscow Institute of Radio Engineering, Electronics and Automation, in 2008 - the Academy Federal Service security of the Russian Federation.

From 1997 to 2012, Sergei Bondarenko served in the FSB of the Russian Federation. He finished his service with the rank of colonel.

After completing his service in the state security agencies, he continued his career in political sphere and bodies executive power Moscow region.

From 2013 to September 2016, he worked at JSC Oboronenergosbyt as Deputy General Director for Economic Security.

VYALKOV Dmitry Vladimirovich - Deputy General Director for the development and implementation of services

Dmitry Vyalkov was born on August 23, 1981 in Turinsk, Sverdlovsk Region.

Graduated from the Ural State Forest Engineering University with a degree in Economics and Enterprise Management. In addition to knowledge in the field of economics, he has the specialty "Accounting and control", which he received after graduating from a secondary professional educational institution. In addition, Dmitry Vyalkov graduated from the Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin in the direction of "Management".

Dmitry Vyalkov began his career as an economist at the Turin Pulp and Paper Mill.

Since 2009, his career and labor path connected with the grid complex of OAO IDGC of Urals. Prior to joining the energy system, Dmitry Vyalkov headed the financial divisions of large enterprises operating in the housing and communal services system, as well as in the field of construction and reconstruction of industrial facilities in the oil and gas complex.

From 2009 to 2014, Dmitry Vyalkov worked at Sverdlovenergo, a branch of OAO IDGC of the Urals, successively holding the positions of Head of Investment Projects Service, Head of Investments and Head of Prospective Development and Technological Connection. With his participation in the branch of IDGC of Urals, JSC - Sverdlovenergo, large investment projects were implemented for the construction of grid facilities, the work on technological connection of consumers in the Sverdlovsk region was brought to a new qualitative level, and modern standards for customer service in the branch were introduced.

In 2014, Dmitry Vyalkov was appointed to the position of Head of the Technological Connection Department of IDGC of Urals, JSC.

On January 11, 2016, Dmitry Vyalkov took up his duties as acting. Deputy General for Development and Sales of Services of OAO IDGC of Urals.

On July 15, 2016, by the decision of the Board of Directors of IDGC of Urals, JSC, Dmitry Vyalkov's candidacy was approved for the position of Deputy General Director for Development and Sales of Services of IDGC of Urals, JSC.

ZOLOTAREV Sergey Mikhailovich - Deputy General Director - Director of the branch "Chelyabenergo"

Born on July 14, 1966 in Korkino, Chelyabinsk region.

In 1988 he graduated from the Chelyabinsk Polytechnic Institute with a degree in Power Supply. industrial enterprises, cities and agriculture".

After graduating from the university, Sergei Zolotarev came to work at the Chelyabinsk Electrometallurgical Plant, where he worked his way up from an electrical equipment repairman to a deputy chief power engineer.

From 1995 to 1997 Sergei Zolotarev worked as an inspector of Energonadzor of OAO Chelyabenergo.

From 1997 to 2002 He was the head of the inspection service of the Central Electric Grids of JSC Chelyabenergo.

From 2002 to 2005 worked in the Chelyabinsk energy system as a chief engineer - head of the inspection service of the Central Territorial Administration "Energosbyt" of JSC "Chelyabenergo".

From 2005 to 2006 He was the head of the service sales service of OAO Chelyabenergo.

In 2007, he was appointed Director for the sale of services of JSC Chelyabenergo, and then Deputy General Director for the development and sale of services of JSC Chelyabenergo.

From 2008 to June 2015, Sergey Zolotarev was Deputy General Director for the development and sale of services of IDGC of Urals, JSC.

On June 27, 2015, he started working at the Chelyabenergo branch as the head of the Chelyabinsk division of the company.

ILLARIONOV Eduard Ivanovich - acting Deputy General Director - Director of the branch "Permenergo"

He began his career in the power industry as a power line service master. Later he worked at the Perm enterprise of the branch of PJSC FGC UES - Main electrical networks of the Urals, in the Regional Center technical inspection Ural. In 2006 he was appointed Chief Engineer of Permenergo's Berezniki Power Grids, and in 2008 he became Deputy Chief Engineer for Operational and Technological Management of Perm City Power Grids.

From the beginning of 2011 to January 2012 - Deputy Chief Engineer for Operation of the Permenergo branch.

In the period from January 2012 to December 2016, he worked as the director of the production department of Perm City Electric Networks.

From December 2016 to the present - Deputy Director - Chief Engineer of the Permenergo branch.

On October 8, 2019, he assumed the duties of the director of the branch of IDGC of Urals, JSC - Permenergo.

KRIVIAKOV Alexander Mikhailovich - Deputy General Director

Alexander Mikhailovich was born on March 14, 1952 in Kamensk-Uralsky.

Graduated from the Ural Polytechnic Institute. CM. Kirov, majoring in "Electric Power Plants".

Alexander Krivyakov began his career at the Ural Aluminum Plant, where he worked in the field of energy profile.

From 1977 to 1983, Alexander Krivyakov carried out his activities in the Komsomol bodies.

From 1983 to 2010 he served in the KGB of the USSR, the FSB of Russia.

From 2011 to 2014, after completing his career in the state security agencies, Alexander Krivyakov oversaw security issues in the largest regional companies.

In February 2015, Alexander Krivyakov was appointed to the position of Deputy General Director for Security of IDGC of Urals, JSC.

By the decision of the Board of Directors of IDGC of Urals, JSC dated April 28, 2016, he was appointed to the position of Deputy General Director.

For achieving high results in military service, he was awarded the Order of the Red Star, 15 medals, including the medal of the Republic of Afghanistan "For Courage", signs "Honorary Counterintelligence Officer", "For Service in Counterintelligence" III, II, I degree. He has the military rank of lieutenant general.

MELNIKOV Andrey Rudolfovich - Deputy General Director - Director of the branch "Sverdlovenergo"

Melnikov Andrei Rudolfovich was born on September 4, 1961.

Andrey Melnikov graduated from the Ural State Technical University with a degree in Electric Power Systems and Networks. His work experience in the energy industry of the Urals is 36 years.

He began his career in 1982 in the Nizhny Tagil electrical networks of the REU Sverdlovenergo. Over the years of work in the power system, he has worked his way up from an electrician to a chief engineer. In the period from 1991 to 2009, he worked as the chief engineer of the Nizhny Tagil electrical networks of JSC Sverdlovenergo. From 2009 to September 2018 - First Deputy General Director - Chief Engineer of the branch of PJSC FGC UES - MES Ural".

In 2013 Andrey Melnikov was awarded the title of Honored Power Engineer of the Russian Federation.

On October 1, 2018, the top manager began his work at IDGC of Urals, JSC as Deputy General Director - Director of the Sverdlovenergo branch.

PETROVA Alla Alexandrovna - Deputy General Director for Corporate Governance

Alla Aleksandrovna was born on October 4 in the city of Barnaul.

Graduated from Altai State University with a degree in Jurisprudence.

After graduating from the university until 2002, Alla Petrova worked in the field of jurisprudence in commercial structures of the Altai Territory as a legal adviser.

From 2002 to 2007, she worked in the legal department of JSC Altaienergo.

From 2007 to 2014, she continued her career in the energy sector at OJSC Altaienergosbyt. Prior to her appointment to the Urals, Alla Petrova was Deputy Managing Director for Legal and Corporate Affairs of this sales company.

In February 2015, Alla Petrova was appointed to the position of Deputy General Director for Corporate Governance of IDGC of Urals, JSC.

RASKINA Natalia Viktorovna – chief accountant

Natalya Viktorovna was born on April 12 in Sverdlovsk.

Has two higher education. In 1995 she graduated from the Sverdlovsk Institute of National Economy (now USUE) with a degree in Finance and Credit, and in 2003 from the Ural State Technical University (now UrFU) with a degree in Management.

Immediately after graduating from the university in 1995, Natalya Raskina came to work as an accountant of the 1st category in the pre-reform JSC Sverdlovenergo, where she worked until 2005.

From 2005 to 2008, she worked as Deputy Chief Accountant for IFRS of OAO IDGC of Urals. From 2008 to 2019, she continued her work in the company as Deputy Chief Accountant for IFRS and consolidated financial statements.

The total work experience of Natalia Raskina in the energy sector exceeds 23 years. During this time, it has repeatedly been awarded numerous industry and corporate awards of IDGC of Urals, JSC.

On May 31, 2019, Natalya Raskina was appointed Chief Accountant of IDGC of Urals, JSC.

CHEREPANOV Vladislav Rufovich - Deputy General Director for Investment Activities

Vladislav Cherepanov was born on March 5, 1969 in Lysva, Perm Territory.

Graduated from the Ural Federal University. the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin with a degree in Enterprise Management. In addition to knowledge in the field of economics and enterprise management, he has the specialty "Construction and operation of buildings and structures", which he received after graduating from the Chusovoy Industrial College.

Vladislav Cherepanov began his career at the Lysva Metallurgical Plant.

Since 1991, Vladislav Cherepanov's career has been associated with the energy industry. From 1991 to 2008, he worked in the Chusovoy electrical networks of OJSC Permenergo, where he worked his way up from a simple worker to the head of the capital construction department.

From 2008 to 2012, he worked as the head of the capital construction department of the Perm city electric networks of the branch of OAO IDGC of the Urals - Permenergo. From 2012 to 2015, Vladislav Cherepanov was Deputy Director for Capital Construction of this production department.

From 2015 to 2019, he continued his career at Chelyabenergo, a branch of OAO IDGC of Urals, as Deputy Director for Investment Activities.

The total work experience of Vladislav Cherepanov in the energy sector exceeds 27 years. During this time, it has been repeatedly awarded with numerous regional, industry and corporate awards by Rosseti Ural.

On July 1, 2019, he was appointed to the position of Deputy General Director for Investment Activities of Rosseti Urals (OAO IDGC of Urals).

SHERBAKOVA Valentina Mikhailovna - Deputy General Director for Economics and Finance

Valentina Shcherbakova was born on January 16 in the village of Karamyshevo, Zmeinogorsky district, Altai Territory.

Graduated from Novosibirsk State University with a degree in Economics and Mathematics.

After graduation, she worked in the Altai department of the Institute of Economics and Organization industrial production SO RAN.

From 1992 to 2001, she continued her career at the Property Fund of the Altai Territory, where she successively held the positions of chief specialist, head of department, and then deputy chairman of the Fund.

From 2001 to 2003, Valentina Shcherbakova was the commercial director of OAO Altaysvyaz.

In 2003, she was appointed Deputy Director for Corporate Policy at OAO Altaienergo.

After the unpacking of the Altai energy system was completed, Valentina Shcherbakova continued her career in the branch of JSC IDGC of Siberia - Altayenergo as the head of the economics and finance department, and then deputy director for this area of work.

In February 2015, Valentina Shcherbakova was appointed to the position of acting. Deputy General Director for Economics and Finance, OAO IDGC of Urals.

On March 3, 2015, in accordance with the decision of the Board of Directors of IDGC of Urals, JSC, Valentina Shcherbakova began to perform her duties in the status of Deputy General Director for Economics and Finance.

Keywords

ECONOMIC SPACE / SPATIAL ECONOMY/ REGION / SPATIAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM/ INFRASTRUCTURE / ECONOMIC SPACE / SPATIAL ECONOMY / REGION / SPATIAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM / INFRASTRUCTURE

annotation scientific article on economics and business, author of scientific work - Dyachkov Anton Gennadievich, Surnina Nadezhda Matveevna, Shishkina Elena Aleksandrovna

The article studies the organization of communication spatial systems of the region . The main properties of the regional economic space, affecting its configuration on present stage. The role of the infrastructure complex in the development of the regional economic space and formation of communication spatial systems. The communication properties of the infrastructure as a communication spatial system are revealed. The main directions of development of communication spatial systems in the system of development priorities of the Russian Federation are presented. From the standpoint of the institutional approach, the mechanisms for the development of the energy infrastructure of the regional economic space. The problem of harmonizing the interests of regional authorities and the business community in planning the development of the territory is considered, the institutional environment of their interaction is investigated, and the actual problem of synchronization of strategic documents for the development of the territory and business is revealed.

On organization of the communicational infrastructural spatial systems of the region

The article presents a research of organization of the communicational spatial systems of the region. The main properties of the regional economic space that influence on its configuration at the present stage have been identified from the perspective of the systemic approach. The role of the infrastructural complex in the development of the regional economic space and in the formation of the communicational spatial systems have been discussed. Communicational properties of the infrastructure as a communicational spatial system have been identified. The main development directions of communicational spatial systems in the system of the development priorities of the Russian Federation have been presented. The development mechanisms of energy infrastructure of the regional economic space have been identified from the perspective of the institutional approach. The problem of coordination of interests of regional authorities and business community when planning the territory development has been discussed; the institutional environment of their interaction is also studied in the article. The authors have identified a relevant problem of synchronization of the strategic documents of the development of the territory and business.

The text of the scientific work on the topic "On the organization of communication infrastructure spatial systems of the region"

RESEARCH

111 Dyachkov A.G. , Surnina N.M. , Shishkina E.A.

1 Ural State University of Economics, Yekaterinburg

To the question of organization of communication infrastructural spatial systems of the region

ANNOTATION:

The article studies the organization of communication spatial systems of the region. From the standpoint of a systematic approach, the main properties of the regional economic space that affect its configuration at the present stage are determined. The role of the infrastructure complex in the development of the regional economic space and the formation of communication spatial systems is considered. The communication properties of the infrastructure as a communication spatial system are revealed. The main directions of development of communication spatial systems in the system of development priorities of the Russian Federation are presented. From the standpoint of the institutional approach, the mechanisms for the development of the energy infrastructure of the regional economic space are determined. The problem of harmonizing the interests of regional authorities and the business community in planning the development of the territory is considered, the institutional environment of their interaction is investigated, and the actual problem of synchronization of strategic documents for the development of the territory and business is revealed.

KEY WORDS: economic space, spatial economy, region, spatial communication system, infrastructure

JEL: O18, O21, R11

FOR QUOTATION:

Dyachkov A.G., Surnina N.M., Shishkina E.A. On the issue of organization of communication infrastructural spatial systems of the region // Russian entrepreneurship. - 2016. - T. 17. - No. 24. - S. 3515-3530. - doi: 10.18334/rp.17.24.37264

Dyachkov Anton Gennadievich, competitor, Ural State University of Economics, Yekaterinburg; Deputy General Director for Investment Activities, OAO IDGC of Urals, Yekaterinburg

Surnina Nadezhda Matveevna, Doctor of Economics, Professor; Professor of the Department of Statistics, Econometrics and Informatics, Ural State University of Economics, Yekaterinburg

Shishkina Elena Alexandrovna, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Statistics, Econometrics and Informatics, Ural State University of Economics, Yekaterinburg ( [email protected])

OPEN ACCESS: http://dx.doi.org/10.18334/rp.17.24.37264

The article is distributed under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) PUBLISHING LANGUAGE: Russian

Introduction

Modern strategic priorities for the development of the Russian Federation focus on the need to improve the settlement system on the territory of the Russian Federation and priority areas location of productive forces in the country. The main challenges currently emerging are the challenges of innovative development, post-industrial transformation, new industrialization, testing the strength of the former internal and external borders, environmental issues- they also have a spatial dimension, since they imply a certain reflection in the main structures of the country's space and require the search for new directions for its spatial development.

These circumstances actualize the need to develop and scientifically substantiate a mechanism for improving the prospective organization of the main communication spatial systems in Russia - transport, energy, information, taking into account the priorities of the spatial location of industrial complexes, settlement systems and territory development.

Fundamentals of the formation, development and configuration of the regional economic space at the present stage

The new system methodology is based on the concept according to which the socio-economic space is considered as one system, which includes a set of relatively independent subsystems, the composition and structure of which is determined in accordance with the position of the observer or group of observers . The composition of the elements of the regional economic system include, according to generally accepted views, enterprises, organizations of the country and other types of economic objects, as well as institutions and institutional sets, socio-economic processes, programs and projects, etc.

The study of the characteristics of the socio-economic space is engaged in a relatively new scientific direction"spatial economy". The modern spatial economy organically includes diverse schools, represented by studies of an economic and geographical nature (S.S. Artobolevsky, A.I. Treyvish, O.V. Gritsai, etc.), works devoted to issues of the sphere local government and federalism (V.N. Leksin, A.M. Lavrov, A.N. Shvetsov, etc.),

patterns of spatial development (M.K. Bandman, V. Suslov, S. Suspitsyn, R.I. Shniper, A.Ya. Yakobson, P.A. Minakir), regional features of development (V.I. Butov, V.G. Ignatov, N.P. Ketova, M. Galeev, R. Khakimov, G. Singatullina).

It is characteristic that the spatial economy is based on a number of principles in the study of regions, which should be used to solve the problems of this study: firstly, balance, secondly, sustainability, and thirdly, self-development. Summarizing the ideas about the regularities of the spatial economy (Animitsa E.G., Vlasova N.Yu., Surnina N.M. and others), it is necessary to highlight the most important features for the modern stage:

Network hierarchical nature of the relationships of organizations, production;

Availability of self-development potential;

Diffusion of ideas and values as the fundamental principle of spatial transformations of economies;

The interdependence of economies, the need for their joint development in order to balance, etc.

Particular attention deserves the spatial development of the economy as a phenomenon, awareness of the need and inclusion in the system of management and self-government of the economic entity of the goals and values of the system of the highest hierarchical level, consistent with the same supersystems. In accordance with the main strategic documents, the term spatial development is proposed to be understood as changes in the spatial (territorial) organization of society, and we will be guided by this definition in this article.

Considering the regional economic space as a space for deploying a system of economic relations, we will establish the main properties that determine its configuration from the standpoint of a systematic approach:

Fractality is a similarity of economic spaces of various levels, i.e. when one economic space, being an independent part, is invested in another, and at the same time both represent a single integrity, have similar properties and parameters. Therefore, a single economic space can only be formed if

individual regional economic processes will have a fairly similar structure;

Heterogeneity - a different degree of concentration of economic processes occurring in economic spaces, due to their non-linearity;

Hierarchy - multi-level, multi-stage space, which at the same time has the property of integrity;

Self-organization - the ability of the economic space to a certain extent to neutralize the consequences of external and internal negative processes, which increases sustainability economic activity economic entities and the level of their organization;

Connectedness - the level of development of various ties (communication, transport, trade, cooperation) arising in the economic space;

Availability - reliability, comfort, safety, maintainability of space, the ability to perform agreed functions.

Figure 1. Factors of development of the regional economic space

Thus, the change in the above properties is influenced by a combination of various factors, which causes both a change in one economic space over time and a difference in economic spaces among themselves. The interaction of factors under different circumstances, on the one hand, can

to strengthen the unity of the economic space, and on the other hand, to generate gaps, violation of integrity (Fig. 1).

External factors in the development of the economic space can be defined as the reasons that determine the change in the properties of the regional economic space, regardless of the internal processes taking place on its territory, determined by the action of forces of a higher level (geopolitical processes, globalization, technological structures, etc.). Internal factors in the development of the economic space should be understood as the reasons that determine the change in the properties of the regional economic space, depending on the intra-regional processes of their consistency.

Analysis of external and internal factors, affecting the configuration of the economic space, allows us to draw the following conclusions:

Factors determined by the processes of globalization contribute to and create conditions for the formation of a single economic space, which is manifested in the strengthening of the fractality of space, since a homogeneous institutional environment determines the same structure of economic subspaces embedded in it;

The communication structure of space determines its integrity (unevenness), is one of the most significant factors of space binding;

High unevenness is the result different speeds the course of economic processes in the regions;

The strong sparseness of space is a consequence of the poor development of the country's territory, the low density of settlement.

Thus, the impact of the above factors in their various combinations determines the quality of the economic space - it can both polarize the economic space and smooth it out, making the economic space of the regions different from each other by the structure of aggregate economic processes.

Study economic development RF over the past 5 years (2011-2015) shows that it was characterized by a gradual weakening of the dynamics of development with an average annual growth rate of 1.2% (for comparison, for the period from 2001 to 2010, this

the figure was 4.8%). The key macroeconomic factor in the development of the Russian economy in this period was the continued significant impact on the general economic dynamics of external conditions - lower energy prices on the world market, aggravation of the geopolitical situation and increased economic sanctions against the Russian Federation, which led to increased uncertainty and a sharp deterioration in business confidence, negatively affected investment demand and consumer sentiment, caused an outflow of capital and increased inflation. The fall in oil prices and the aggravation of the external economic situation since mid-2014 have led to a further deterioration in the conditions for economic growth. In 2014, GDP growth rates slowed down to 0.7%, and in 2015, the country's GDP decreased by 3.7% compared to 2014 and ended up in the area of negative values.

Consequently, the most significant factors influencing the configuration of the economic space of the Russian Federation at the present stage are:

Firstly, centripetality, which has fractal properties, i.e. a sharp increase in the economic role of the capital, a somewhat less obvious, but intensive strengthening of the economic and political role of regional capitals, as well as municipalities with centers - large cities;

Secondly, the strengthening of inter-regional contrasts, as well as the heterogeneity of the economic space, manifested by a significant unevenness of regional development;

Thirdly, the unfavorable geopolitical situation in the world, which requires strengthening the self-organization of the economic space;

Fourthly, poor infrastructural development, affecting the heterogeneity and self-organization of space, - a significant discrepancy between the spaces of the country and the forms of its modern infrastructural, technical and technological arrangement - a communication (or network) gap;

Fifth, institutional restrictions due to insufficient development of the territorial block of legislation.

Thus, all of the above factors require the study of the nature of their influence on the spatial development of the country for

inclusion in the strategy and plans for the spatial development of territories.

The role of the infrastructure complex in the development of the regional economic space and the formation of communication spatial systems

The infrastructure of the economic space has a significant impact on the connectivity and homogeneity of the regional economic space.

Analysis of research on the problem of infrastructure development, presented in the works of A.I. Tatarkin, P. Samuelson, P. Rosenstein-Rodan, R. Johimson, K. Viksel, A.G. Granberg, P. Kutner, S.A. Heinman, R.I. Shniper, as well as E.G. Animitsy, V.S. Bochko, N.Yu. Vlasova, A.Yu. Davankova, E.P. Woodpecker, E.B. Dvoryadkina, Yu.G. Lavrikova, A.N. Pytkina, N.M. Ratner, O.A. Romanova, N.M. Surnina, V.P. Chichkanova and others, allows us to distinguish the following approaches to the definition of its concept:

First, the totality of certain types of auxiliary components in social production;

Secondly, a set of conditions that ensure the favorable development of entrepreneurship and meet the needs of the population;

Thirdly, the foundation for the development of all other sectors of the economy, the base that serves their functioning and development;

Fourthly, as the basis for the design of certain spatial forms of organization of economic relations.

The infrastructure of the economic space can be classified in several ways (Fig. 2).

Note that the above grounds for the classification of infrastructure facilities are interrelated, i.e. the same type of infrastructure can be classified in several ways, with the spatial factor being the most universal for classification and applicable to any type of infrastructure.

The spatial dimension of infrastructure development implies the degree of infrastructure development in the territory and is manifested in changes certain aspects territorial organization of regions and their components, includes parameters such as coverage of territories certain types infrastructure, density

infrastructure facilities, their condition and other parameters for the development of the infrastructure complex as a whole.

Figure 2. Classification of the infrastructure of the economic space

Thus, the spatial functions of infrastructure in territorial (regional) development are as follows:

1. Communication - the formation of conditions for the development of objects in interaction with each other, their infrastructural and geographical position (relative to infrastructure objects, networks and "corridors").

2. Accommodation - infrastructure as a factor in the placement of new facilities and / or transformation of old ones (reconstruction, dismantling, etc.).

3. Differentiating - functional, sectoral and territorial differences in the infrastructure equipment of territories are the cause of the emergence, strengthening, smoothing and at the same time a way to regulate the differentiation of regions according to various characteristics.

4. Integrating - the formation of territorial systems and territorial complexes based on the development of infrastructure, ensuring their internal and external communications and causing changes.

5. Managerial - infrastructure management - one of the functions of territorial administration, infrastructure equipment of the territory, the most important tool for managerial influence on the territorial organization of regions.

Consequently, the infrastructure is an active factor in the territorial development, despite the possible change in the functions of the infrastructure, its socio-economic and spatial role remains significant in the development of the regional socio-economic system. The role of infrastructure as an organizer of economic and social space is defined in strategic documents at the national, regional and local levels.

Within the framework of this article, the “spatial communication system” is considered by the authors in the context of a system-structural approach as a system that includes a variety of communication links of a set of interacting and in a certain way organized service structures or objects in a certain territory, whose activities are aimed at creating conditions for its sustainable development and functioning.

Development of communication spatial systems as a system of priorities for the development of the Russian Federation

At present, the improvement of the prospective organization of the main communication spatial systems of Russia - transport, energy, information - occupies a special place in the priorities of Russia's spatial development.

Communication properties of the infrastructure as

communication spatial system (as a subsystem of economic space) are determined, on the one hand, by the technical technological level of development of infrastructure facilities, as well as the well-established communications between users, owners, management bodies of these objects (policy consistency, decision-making speed, etc.) (Fig. 3 ).

Factors of development of a communication spatial system (infrastructure)

Level technical equipment(compliance with the technological order) The level of development of communications (the speed of decision-making)

Figure 3. Factors of development of communication spatial systems

The above factors affect the level of development of the communication spatial system both in a complex (both factors) and separately. Consequently, there is a direct relationship between the level of development of communication spatial systems and the degree of connectedness, homogeneity and accessibility of space.

The most significant factors in the development of the communication spatial system (infrastructure) of the first group (the level of technical equipment) include the continuing inconsistency of priorities and tools to support the scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation at the national, sectoral and corporate levels, which does not allow the formation of production chains for creating value added of high-tech products and services, ensure the greatest multiplier effect from the use of emerging technologies; the exhaustion of Russia's economic growth opportunities based on the extensive exploitation of raw materials, against the backdrop of the emergence of a limited group of leading countries with new production technologies and focused on the use of renewable resources; the risks of Russia lagging behind the countries of world technological leaders and the depreciation of domestic investments in the field of science and technology reduce the independence and competitiveness of Russia in the world, jeopardize the national security of the country; the need for effective development of space, including by overcoming disproportions in the socio-economic development of the country's territories, the creation of national technological platforms, options for their territorial location, etc. .

The second group of factors “the level of development of communications (speed of decision-making)” is determined by the existing institutional environment, the role of institutions in the economy. Isolation of institutional and economic relations, along with socio-economic ones, makes it possible to more clearly define the role of institutions in the economy, which determine the effectiveness of the development of the economic system. A change in the influence of the above factors in the development of communication spatial systems can occur both purposefully and accidentally. Targeted changes are, as a rule, programmatic (planned, project)

nature, while targeted activities in a particular area may cause unintended consequences.

Thus, the process of spatial development is carried out with the active participation of infrastructure, primarily transport, energy, information and other systems.

Considering the role of energy infrastructure, we note that the effective functioning of enterprises of the energy complex and the development of energy infrastructure is the basis for sustainable socio-economic development of territories. Development of promising directions for the development of energy companies in the regions of the country in connection with the strategic direction of the development of the complex for national economy largely depends on the system state regulation. Strategic planning development of the energy complex of the region is a rather complex process, since it involves taking into account a set of interests of the national, regional, corporate levels in the field of energy supply to business entities and the population of the territory, forecasting (assessment) of the need for placement and development of federal engineering, transport and social infrastructure, taking into account promising economic specialization respective territories.

At the same time, such problems of energy development remain unresolved, such as:

A significant number of power grid facilities are in high physical wear and tear, which requires immediate reconstruction;

A significant number of obsolete relay protection and automation devices, emergency automation, automatic information and measuring system for commercial electricity metering, the need for reconstruction and modernization of system-wide controls;

Lack of coordination of territorial development plans with plans for the development of the power grid complex and the availability of power grid infrastructure, which is expressed, among other things, in the construction of unclaimed power grid facilities in the presence of unloaded existing ones;

The presence of enterprises that own non-core network facilities, the operation of which is at a low level or

absent, which also leads to a decrease in the reliability and electrical safety of objects;

Insufficient funding for the reconstruction of the low-voltage network and lack of funding for network maintenance from small network companies;

The problem of registration of easements for land plots of protected zones, access to private development areas along which lines pass, etc. .

Thus, energy companies face the challenge of increasing investment in development to address the above problems and meet the growing demand of the economy for energy resources.

Investment attractiveness regional

The electric power industry depends largely on the completeness, efficiency, objectivity and reliability of information about the company's activities, the consistency of the main documents for the development of companies and the territories where they operate, the provision of the developed site with all the necessary infrastructure, which is largely determined by the effectiveness of territorial (spatial) planning.

Therefore, an important task for the development of energy infrastructure from the standpoint of the institutional approach is the joint development of comprehensive documents for the social and economic development of regions, municipalities and strategic important enterprises located on their territory. From the very beginning of their operation in the region, enterprises must integrate their development strategy with the strategic goals and objectives of the region's development, ensuring the availability of information necessary for the development and adoption of relevant documents based on optimal management decisions, with a high level of coherence of economic interests.

Based on the position of the system approach, as a basic model for representing the above provisions, you can use the static model of system analysis - the “system composition” model. In accordance with this model, elements and subsystems are determined, as well as links between them (Fig. 4).

Figure 4. Model for the formation of the investment policy for the development of the energy sector in the region

AT recent times The activities of the Novosibirsk Group of companies "RusEnergoMir" are increasingly heard when it comes to the implementation of major projects in the field of energy saving and energy efficiency. At least in the professional environment, she is called one of the leaders in this direction. The holding's specialists participated in the creation of almost 400 automated systems(AIIS KUE, ASDU, APCS and others) in various regions of Russia and neighboring countries. The list of customers includes dozens largest enterprises and organizations of the federal level, including enterprises of Rosatom, Roscosmos, Russian railways, FGC UES, IDGC Holding, RusHydro and many others.

We met Anton Dyachkov, General Director of the RusEnergoMir Group of Companies, one of the youngest top managers of the Russian energy industry, at a reception honoring the winners of the All-Russian Contest of Energy Efficient Practices Energium-2012. The company was noted by the jury in the nomination "Business" in the category "New Technologies" for the implementation of the project for the implementation of automated control systems at 19 facilities of Moscow sports. The system allows you to remotely collect data on the consumption of energy resources and water, control the level of illumination of the premises, control the temperature and humidity of the air, as well as issue a summary analysis of energy consumption and data on planning for their economical use.

Mr. Dyachkov briefly commented on the results of the competition: “I am very glad that our efforts were appreciated and the work of the group of companies did not go unnoticed. We proved to ourselves and others that we are on the right track. I hope that in the near future there will be no need to hold such competitions, because all enterprises will become energy efficient.”

There are not many projects

- Anton Gennadievich, the task of introducing ASUE in institutions Moskomsport was not the only one that RusEnergoMir specialists worked on this year. What else key projects can you name?

In the spring, we completed the construction of a 110 kV transmission line for the needs of the Raspadskaya Coal Company in the Kemerovo Region. For our company it was a serious test. After all, we have not previously dealt with lines of this voltage class, having only experience in the construction of lines of 6, 10, 35 kV. Today, I can proudly state that RusEnergoMir coped with the task set, and the object, which was given very close attention federal authorities power, no complaints.

Another serious matter for us was the participation of our company in the Smart Metering project to create an integrated system of intelligent electricity metering (KSUE) in Perm. Its implementation was carried out within the framework of the federal program “Count. Save. Pay” at the initiative of the Commission for Modernization and Technological Development of the Russian Economy and JSC IDGC Holding. As part of the project, our specialists completed the installation of more than 10 thousand smart production meters for the customer French company Sagemcom.

About 150 employees were involved in Perm, including management and engineering staff, special equipment, warehouse and office rooms. That is, in fact, we had to organize an independent branch there, which has its own resource base and infrastructure. After all, design, installation and commissioning were carried out exclusively by our own structural divisions.

In principle, it turns out that projects for the introduction of energy efficient technologies are a kind of strong point for a group of companies?

Indeed, we treat the topic of energy efficiency very carefully. In fact, even before the signing federal law about energy saving, we monitored the process of its preparation, got acquainted with the necessary documentation. We have specialists in energy surveys, we regularly invest in the purchase and renewal of equipment and the expansion of the instrument park. Currently, the RusEnergoMir Group of Companies is implementing a number of energy audit projects, negotiations are underway to conduct energy audits for other federal, regional and municipal customers.

- For example?

I can name the cooperation of the RusEnergoMir Group of Companies with the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation in carrying out a full cycle of work on the creation and testing of automated control systems in 48 educational institutions located throughout Russia. The list of universities includes eminent universities in Moscow, St. Petersburg, the Urals, Siberia, the Far East and other regions. As part of the project, studies were carried out there on the consumption of electricity, gas, heat, hot and cold water. For universities, a concept of energy saving management was formed, pre-project surveys, prepared technical task for the creation of ASUE, and also developed software with system behavior algorithms and user interfaces.

Let me emphasize that the introduction of ASUE in educational institutions is a complete cycle from start to finish. Our specialists not only develop and implement the system, but also show how to work with it. As a result, universities that have implemented the system will be able to save up to 20 million rubles a year by implementing the energy saving measures recommended by them.

Step by step

Anton Gennadyevich, the geography of RusEnergoMir's presence is impressive. How do you manage to mobilize forces and succeed everywhere?

You are right, we are in fact geographically mobile and today we have experience in successfully implementing projects in the most extreme points Russian Federation. And the complexity of the work does not scare us at all. In general, I believe that the more difficult the task set before us, the more interesting it is to implement it. At the same time, I want to emphasize that we always soberly assess our capabilities.

RusEnergoMir, as an engineering company operating in various segments of the energy services market, has already established itself among largest customers. Will you reveal the secret of the company?

You just need to be responsible. This is the main thing. I think what makes us attractive is an integrated approach to project implementation, as a result of which the customer receives a turnkey facility or system and a flexible pricing approach, which is due to production efficiency and the ability to perform most of the work on our own, bypassing subcontractors. Naturally, in order to achieve such results, we constantly pay great attention to the development, training of personnel, aspects of production quality and work to increase the competitiveness of the services provided. So we try to meet the needs of the most demanding customers.

Future plans

- The traditional question about plans. Much planned for 2013?

We will continue the implementation of already launched projects in the field of energy saving. There are also new challenges. In particular, not so long ago we signed a contract to conduct an energy audit at the facilities of the Russian Agricultural Bank. Also, traditionally, we continue to implement projects for the design of the reconstruction of power grid facilities for the branches of FGC UES and IDGC Holding. I am sure that the experience we have accumulated will certainly come in handy, and we will be able to complete everything in a quality and timely manner.

- That is, the new projects of the RusEnergoMir Group of Companies will be associated with smart energy management systems?

Such systems are the future. In essence, this is an innovative governance scheme that is associated with the modernization of existing methods of managing energy consumption and energy costs. The outdated practice is being replaced by a new comprehensive system for the implementation of energy conservation and energy efficiency policies. I am sure that the introduction of "smart" energy management will definitely give a result in terms of saving resources.

- Thanks for the interview.

Interviewed by Alexey Golubev

Dossier

Dyachkov Anton Gennadievich

Graduated from the Siberian State University of Telecommunications

and informatics, as well as courses at the Novosibirsk Open School of Business.

While still at the university, he began working as a communication systems installer, and then as a customer service specialist, head of the sales department. Since 2008 - Commercial Director, since July 2011 - General Director of RusEnergoMir Management Company LLC.

Blitz Poll

Favourite drink? - Water.

Favourite dish? - Meat steak.

Favorite car brand? - BMW.

Favorite sport? - Swimming.

Motto in life? - There are no hopeless situations!

Dear colleagues!

On behalf of the RusEnergoMir Group of Companies and on my behalf, please accept the most sincere congratulations on the upcoming holidays - Power Engineers Day, New Year and Christmas!

The outgoing year was marked for us by new events, professional victories and achievements. Implementing projects in the field of energy saving and energy efficiency, we continued to introduce automated energy accounting systems and lighting control systems for the largest enterprises and organizations in Russia. Solving the same tasks with you, we strengthened our business relationship, proving their professionalism and dedication to the common cause.

May the coming year 2013 open for you more strength and opportunities for the realization of everything conceived! I wish you new experiences, planned results, good luck and prosperity!

General Director of RusEnergoMir Group of Companies A. G. Dyachkov

To the question of organization of communication infrastructural spatial systems of the region.

annotation scientific article on economics and business, author of scientific work - Dyachkov Anton Gennadievich, Surnina Nadezhda Matveevna, Shishkina Elena Aleksandrovna

Related Topics scientific papers on economics and business, author of scientific work - Dyachkov Anton Gennadievich, Surnina Nadezhda Matveevna, Shishkina Elena Aleksandrovna

On organization of the communicational infrastructural spatial systems of the region

The text of the scientific work on the topic "On the organization of communication infrastructure spatial systems of the region"

Read also on the topic: