2 groups of people were formed k. Social groups and their classification

One of general forms social interaction a social group appears, in which the behavior of each member is to a tangible extent determined by the activity and existence of other members.

Merton defines a group as a set of people who interact with each other in a certain way, are aware of their belonging to this group and are perceived by its members from the point of view of other people. The group has its own identity from the point of view of outsiders.

Consist of a small number of people between whom there are stable emotional relationships, personal relationships based on their individual characteristics. Secondary groups are formed from people between whom there are almost no emotional relationships, their interaction is due to the desire to achieve certain goals, their social roles, business relationship and means of communication are clearly defined. in critical and emergency situations people give preference to the primary group, show devotion to the members of the primary group.

People join groups for a variety of reasons. The group performs:
as a means of biological survival;
as a means of socialization and formation of the human psyche (one of the main functions of the group is the function of socialization);
as a way to do certain work, which cannot be performed by one person (instrumental function of the group);
as a means of satisfying a person's need for communication, in an affectionate and benevolent attitude towards oneself, in obtaining social approval, respect, recognition, trust (an expressive function of the group);
as a means of reducing unpleasant feelings of fear, anxiety (supportive function of the group);
as a source of norms of behavior, social attitudes and value orientations of a person (the normative function of a group);
as a source of a standard by which a person can evaluate himself and other people (comparative function of the group) I as a means of information, material and other exchange. “The totality of individuals who are in mental interaction constitutes a social group, and this interaction comes down to the exchange of various ideas, feelings, desires, mental experiences” (P. Sorokin).

There are several types of groups:
1) conditional and real;
2) permanent and temporary;
3) big and small.

Conditional groups of people are united on a certain basis (sex, age, profession, etc.). Real individuals included in such a group do not have direct interpersonal relationships, may not know anything about each other, even never meet each other.

Real groups of people that really exist as communities in a certain space and time are characterized by the fact that its members are interconnected by objective relationships. Real human groups differ in size, external and internal organization, purpose and social significance. The contact group brings together people who have common goals and interests in a particular area of ​​life and activity. A small group is a fairly stable association of people connected by mutual contacts.

Small group - a small group of people (from 3 to 15 people) who are united by common social activities, are in direct communication, contribute to the emergence of emotional relationships, the development of group norms and the development of group processes.

With a large number of people, the group, as a rule, is divided into subgroups. Distinctive features of a small group: spatial and temporal co-presence of people. This co-presence of people enables contacts that include interactive, informational, perceptual aspects of communication and interaction. Perceptual aspects allow a person to perceive the individuality of all other people in the group, and only in this case can one speak of a small group.

Interaction is the activity of everyone, it is both a stimulus and a reaction to everyone else.

Joint activity implies the presence of a permanent goal. Implementation common purpose as a certain expected result of any activity, in a certain sense it contributes to the realization of the needs of everyone and at the same time corresponds to the general needs. The goal as a prototype of the result and the initial moment joint activities determines the dynamics of the functioning of a small group. There are three types of goals:
1) near prospects, goals that are quickly realized in time and express the needs of this group;
2) secondary goals are longer in time and lead the group to the interests of the secondary team (the interests of the enterprise or the school as a whole);
3) long-term perspectives unite the primary group with the problems of the functioning of the social whole. The socially valuable content of joint activities should become personally significant for each member of the group. What is important is not so much the objective goal of the group as its image, that is, how it is perceived by the members of the group. Goals, characteristics of joint activities "cement" the group into one whole, determine the external formal-target structure of the group.

The presence of an organizing beginning in the group is provided. It may or may not be personified in one of the members of the group (leader, head), but this does not mean that there is no organizing principle. It's just that in this case the leadership function is distributed among the members of the group, and leadership is situation-specific (in certain situation a person who is more advanced in this area than others assumes the functions of a leader).

Separation and differentiation of personal roles (division and cooperation of labor, power division, i.e., the activity of group members is not homogeneous, they make their own, different contribution to joint activities, play different roles).

The presence of emotional relationships between members of the group that affect group activity, can lead to the division of the group into subgroups, form the internal structure of interpersonal relations in the group.

The development of a specific group culture - norms, rules, standards of life, behavior that determine the expectations of group members in relation to each other and determine group dynamics. These norms are the most important sign of group integrity. It is possible to speak about the formed norm if it determines the behavior of the majority of the members of the group, despite all the differences between the members of the group. Deviation from group standards, norms, as a rule, is allowed only to the leader.

The group has the following psychological characteristics: group interests, group needs, etc. (Fig. 9).

The group has the following general patterns:
1) the group will inevitably be structured;
2) the group develops (progress or regression, but dynamic processes occur in the group);
3) fluctuation - a change in a person's place in a group can occur repeatedly.

According to psychological characteristics, there are:
1) membership groups;
2) reference groups (reference), the norms and rules of which serve as a model for the individual.

Reference groups may be real or imagined, positive or negative, may or may not coincide with membership, but they do:
1) the function of social comparison, since the reference group is the source of positive and negative samples;
2) a normative function, since the reference group is the source of norms, rules, to which a person seeks to join.
According to the nature and forms of organization of activities, the following levels of development of contact groups are distinguished (Table 5).

Unorganized (nominal groups, conglomerates) or randomly organized groups (viewers at the cinema, random members of excursion groups, etc.) are characterized by a voluntary temporary association of people based on the similarity of interests or common space.

Association - a group in which relationships are mediated only by personally significant goals (a group of friends, acquaintances).

Cooperation is a group that is distinguished by its actually acting organizational structure, interpersonal relations are of a business nature, subject to the achievement of the required result in the performance of a specific task in a certain type of activity.

A corporation is a group that is united only internal goals that do not go beyond its scope, striving to achieve its corporate goals at any cost, including at the expense of other groups. Sometimes a corporate spirit can take place in work or study groups, when the group acquires the features of group egoism.

The team is a time-stable organizational group of interacting people with specific governing bodies, united by the goals of joint socially useful activities and the complex dynamics of formal (business) and informal relationships between group members.

Thus, real human groups differ in size, external and internal organization, purpose and social significance. As the size of the group increases, the role of its leader increases.

The interdependence of the parties, members of the group in the process of interaction may be equal, or one of the parties may have a stronger influence on the other. Therefore, one- and two-way interaction can be distinguished. Interaction can cover both all spheres of human life - total interaction, and only one specific form or sector of activity. In independent sectors, people may not have any influence on each other.

The direction of the relationship can be solidary, antagonistic or mixed. With solidary interaction, the aspirations and efforts of the parties coincide. If the desires and efforts of the parties are in conflict, then this is an antagonistic form of interaction, if they only partially coincide, this is a mixed type of direction of interaction.

It is possible to distinguish between organized and unorganized interactions. Interaction is organized if the relations of the parties, their actions have developed into a certain structure of rights, duties, functions and are based on a certain system of values.

Unorganized interactions - when relationships and values ​​are in an amorphous state, therefore, rights, duties, functions, social positions are not defined.

Sorokin, combining various interactions, identifies the following types of social interaction:
- organized-antagonistic system of interaction based on coercion;
- an organized solidarity system of interaction based on voluntary membership;
- an organized-mixed, solidary-antagonistic system, which is partly controlled by coercion, and partly by voluntary support for an established system of relationships and values.

“Most organized socially interactive systems, from the family to church and state,” Sorokin notes, “belong to the type of organized-mixed systems. And they can also be disorganized and antagonistic; unorganized solidarity; unorganized-mixed type of interactions.

In long-term organized groups, Sorokin identified 3 types of relationships: family type (interactions are total, extensive, intense, solidary in direction and long, internal unity of group members); contractual type (the limited time of action of the parties interacting within the framework of the contractual sector, the solidarity of relations is selfish and aimed at obtaining mutual benefit, pleasure, or even getting “as much as possible for less”, while the other side is considered not as an ally, but as a certain “tool” that can provide a service, make a profit, etc.); coercive type (antagonism of relations, various forms of coercion: psychological coercion, economic, physical, ideological, military).

The transition from one type to another can be gradual or unpredictable. Mixed types of social interactions are often observed: partly contractual, familial, coercive.

Sorokin emphasizes that social interactions act as socio-cultural ones: 3 processes proceed simultaneously - the interaction of norms, values, standards contained in the minds of a person and a group; interaction of specific people and groups; interaction of materialized values ​​of social life.

Depending on the unifying values, we can distinguish:
- one-sided groups built on the same set of core values ​​(biosocial groups: racial, gender, age; sociocultural groups: gender, language group, religious group, trade union, political or scientific union);
- multi-stakeholder groups built around a combination of several sets of values: family, community, nation, social class.

It is possible to classify groups in terms of the specifics of the dissemination of information and the organization of interaction between members of the group.

So the pyramidal group is:
a) a closed system;
b) is built hierarchically, i.e. the higher the place, the higher the rights and influence;
c) information goes mainly vertically, from bottom to top (reports) and top to bottom (orders);
d) each person knows his hard place;
e) traditions are valued in the group;
f) the head of this group must take care of subordinates, in return they unquestioningly obey;
g) such groups are found in the army, in established production, as well as in extreme situations.

A random group where everyone makes decisions independently, people are relatively independent, moving in different directions, but something unites them. Such groups are found in creative teams, as well as in a situation of market uncertainty, are typical for new commercial structures.

An open group, where everyone has the right to take the initiative, everyone openly discusses issues together. The main thing for them is a common cause. There is a change of roles freely, emotional openness is inherent, informal communication of people is growing.

A group of a synchronous type, when all people are in different places, but everyone is moving in the same direction, since everyone knows what to do, everyone has one image, one model, and although everyone moves by himself, everything is synchronously in one direction, even without discussion or agreement. If any obstacle is encountered, each group enhances its distinctive feature:
- pyramidal - enhances order, discipline, control;
- random - its success depends on the abilities, potential of each member of the group;
- open - its success depends on the ability to reach agreement, negotiate, and its leader must have high communicative qualities, be able to listen, understand, agree;
- synchronous - its success depends on the talent, the authority of the "prophet", who convinced, led people, and people endlessly believe and obey him. It is generally accepted that the most optimal group in terms of size should consist of 7 + 2 (i.e. 5, 7, 9 people). It is also known that a group functions well when it has an odd number of people, since in an even number two warring halves can form. The team functions better if its members differ from each other in age and gender. On the other hand, some management psychologists argue that groups of 12 people work most effectively. The fact is that groups of large numbers are poorly managed, and teams of 7-8 people are the most conflicted, since they usually break up into two warring informal subgroups; with a larger number of people, conflicts, as a rule, are smoothed out.

The conflict of a small group (if it is not formed by people close in spirit) is not least due to the fact that in any work collective there are 8, and if there are not enough employees, then someone has to play not only for themselves, but also for “that guy ", which creates conflict situation. The team leader (manager) needs to know these roles well. It:
1) a coordinator who is respected and knows how to work with people;
2) a generator of ideas, striving to dig to the truth. He is most often not able to translate his ideas into practice;
3) an enthusiast who takes on a new business himself and inspires others;
4) a controller-analyst who is able to soberly assess the idea put forward. He is dutiful, but more often avoids people;
5) a profit-seeker who is interested in the external side of the matter. Executive and can be a good intermediary between people, since he is usually the most popular member of the team;
6) a performer who knows how to bring an idea to life, is capable of painstaking work, but often “drowns” in trifles;
7) a hard worker who does not seek to take anyone's place;
8) grinder - it is necessary so that the last line is not crossed.

Thus, in order for the team to successfully cope with the work, it must not only consist of good specialists. The members of this collective, as individuals, must in their totality correspond to the required set of roles. And in the distribution of official positions, one must proceed from the suitability of individuals to perform a particular role, and not from the personal likes or dislikes of the manager.

Social science. Full course preparation for the exam Shemakhanova Irina Albertovna

3.2. Social groups

3.2. Social groups

social group - this is an objectively existing stable community, a set of individuals interacting in a certain way on the basis of several signs, shared expectations of each member of the group in relation to others. T. Hobbes was the first to define a group as "a certain number of people united by a common interest or common cause."

Differences social groups from mass communities: sustainable interaction, which contributes to the strength and stability of their existence in space and time; relatively high degree of cohesion; clearly expressed homogeneity of the composition, i.e., the presence of signs inherent in all individuals included in the group; entry into wider communities as structural formations.

The main criteria for identifying social groups and communities: by demographic criterion (sex, age, kinship and marriage); by ethnicity (representatives of a tribe, nationality or nation); racially (representatives of Caucasoid, Negroid or Mongoloid race); by settlement and territorial; professional; on educational; according to confessional; according to social class; on the political.

Classification of social groups

1. According to the method of education: spontaneously arisen (informal); specially organized (official); real; conditional.

2. By the size of the group and the way its members interact: small; medium; large; contact (primary); remote (secondary).

3. By the nature of joint activities: practical (joint labor activity); gnostic (joint research activities); aesthetic (joint satisfaction of aesthetic needs); hedonic (leisure, entertaining and gaming); directly communicative; ideological; socio-political.

4. By personal significance: reference; elite.

5. According to social significance: socially positive; asocial - socially destructive; antisocial - criminal, criminal.

Varieties of social groups

1. Depending on the nature of the interaction - primary and secondary.

Primary a group is a group in which the interaction between members is direct, interpersonal in nature and has a high level of emotionality (family, school class, peer group, etc.).

Secondary group - a larger group in which interaction is subordinated to the achievement of a specific goal and is formal, impersonal. In these groups, the focus is on the ability of group members to perform certain functions. Organizations (industrial, political, religious, etc.) can serve as examples of such groups.

2. Depending on the method of organization and regulation of interaction - formal and informal.

Formal group - a group with a legal status, interaction in which is regulated by a system of formalized norms, rules, laws. These groups have a consciously set goal, a normatively fixed hierarchical structure, and act according to the administratively established order (organizations, enterprises, etc.).

informal the group arises spontaneously, on the basis of common views, interests and interpersonal interactions. It is deprived of official regulation and legal status. These groups are usually led by informal leaders. Examples are friendly companies, informal youth associations, rock music lovers, etc.

3. Depending on the belonging of individuals to them:

Ingroup- this is a group to which the individual feels a direct belonging and identifies it as "mine", "our" (for example, "my family", "my class", "my company", etc.).

Outgroup- this is a group to which this individual does not belong and therefore evaluates it as "alien", not his own (other families, another religious group, another ethnic group, etc.).

Reference a group is a real or imaginary social group, the system of values, norms and evaluations of which serves as a standard for the individual. The reference group in the system of relations "personality - society" performs two important functions: normative, being for the individual a source of norms of behavior, social attitudes and value orientations; comparative, acting as a standard for the individual, allows him to determine his place in social structure society, evaluate themselves and others.

4. Depending on the quantitative composition and the form of implementation of connections - small and large.

small group- this is a directly contacting small group of people united to carry out joint activities. Character traits small group: small and stable composition (as a rule, from 2 to 30 people); spatial proximity of group members; stability and duration of existence; a high degree of coincidence of group goals, values, norms and patterns of behavior; intensity of interpersonal relationships; a developed sense of belonging to a group; informal control and information richness in the group; the presence in the group of the organizing principle (leader, manager; the leadership function can be distributed among the members of the group); separation and differentiation of personal roles; the presence of emotional relationships between members of the group that affect group activity, can lead to the division of the group into subgroups, form the internal structure of interpersonal relations in the group.

large group- this is a large group in its composition, which is created for a specific purpose and the interaction in which is indirect ( labor collectives, enterprises, etc.

Types and characteristics of large social groups

* Target social groups are created to perform functions related to certain activities. For example, university students can be considered a formal target social group (the goal of its members is to get an education);

* Territorial (local) social groups are formed on the basis of ties that have developed on the basis of the proximity of the place of residence. A particularly important form of territorial community is ethnos- a set of individuals and groups belonging to the sphere of influence of a state and interconnected by special relations (common language, traditions, culture, as well as self-identification).

* Society- the largest social group, which as a whole is the main object of theoretical or empirical research.

Among large groups, it is customary to single out such social groups as the intelligentsia, employees, representatives of mental and physical labor, the population of cities and villages.

team is a social group in which all vital connections between people are mediated through socially important goals. Characteristic features of the team: a combination of the interests of the individual and society; commonality of goals and principles that act for the members of the team as value orientations and norms of activity. The team performs the following functions: subject - the solution of the problem for which it is created; social and educational - a combination of the interests of the individual and society.

5. Depending on socially significant features:

Real groups- groups identified according to socially significant criteria: gender, age, income, nationality, marital status, profession (occupation), place of residence.

Nominal (conditional) groups are singled out for the purpose of conducting sociological research or statistical registration of the population.

Quasigroup- an informal, spontaneous, unstable social community that does not have a specific structure and system of values, the interaction of people in which, as a rule, is of a third-party and short-term nature. The main types of quasi-groups are: an audience (a social community united by interaction with a communicator and receiving information from him; the heterogeneity of this social entity is due to the difference personal qualities, cultural values ​​and norms of its members); crowd (a temporary, relatively unorganized, unstructured accumulation of people united in a closed physical space by a common interest, while devoid of a clearly perceived goal and interconnected by the similarity of their emotional state); social circles (contact; professional; status; friendly).

The subjects of mass out-of-group behavior are the public and the masses.

Public- a large group of people who have common episodic interests, subject to a single emotional-conscious regulation with the help of generally significant objects of attention (participants in a rally, demonstrations, lecturers, members of cultural societies).

Weight- set a large number people who make up an amorphous formation, who usually do not have direct contacts, but are united by common stable interests. Specific socio-psychological phenomena arise in the mass: fashion, subculture, mass excitement, etc. The mass acts as a subject of broad political and socio-cultural movements, an audience of various mass media, and a consumer of mass culture.

Functions of the social group: place of socialization of the individual, familiarization with social values, norms, rules; instrumental determines the place and forms of work; social- a sense of belonging to this social community, support from its side.

From the book Great Soviet Encyclopedia (CO) of the author TSB

author Shcherbatykh Yury Viktorovich

From the book Alternative Culture. Encyclopedia author Desyaterik Dmitry

Social Centers SOCIAL CENTERS ("centro sociale") - a network of informal centers social assistance in Italy, created and supported by radical leftist youth organizations. It arose in the 1980s through the transformation of the squatter movement. Actually, big

From the book Organization Theory: Cheat Sheet author author unknown

From the book Fundamentals of Sociology and Political Science: Cheat Sheet author author unknown

29. SOCIAL GROUPS, SIGNS AND TYPES A social group is an association of people connected by common relations that are regulated by special social institutions and having common norms, values ​​and traditions. The bonding factor for a social group is

From the book Political Science: Cheat Sheet author author unknown

30. SOCIAL RELATIONS Social interactions are the actions of an individual, group, community, performed in relation to other subjects. Therefore, relationships and connections arise between them. These connections become stable and long-lasting if they concern

From the book Sociology: Cheat Sheet author author unknown

33. SUBJECTS OF POLITICAL LIFE. INTEREST GROUPS AND PRESSURE GROUPS social life is a person, and the initial subject of political life is a citizen. A citizen is any member of society who has citizenship. Citizenship is

From the book You and Your Child author Team of authors

40. SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS. SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS Social organizations are artificially created social societies, which can also be considered a kind of social institutions. They are arranged on the basis of a hierarchical structure Elements in the structure

From the book Encyclopedia of the Lawyer of the author

Social Relations The child really develops in the process of communication with adults and peers. Among them are brothers and sisters, other relatives and children that he has to deal with outside the family - with a nanny, in a manger or on a playground.

From the book Oddities of Our Evolution author Harrison Keith

Social services SOCIAL SERVICES - enterprises and institutions, regardless of ownership, providing social services, as well as citizens involved in entrepreneurial activity on social services population without legal education

From the book The Psychology of Love and Sex [Popular Encyclopedia] author Shcherbatykh Yury Viktorovich

Social factors It is widely believed that since man is a social animal, our social organization acts as a kind of obstacle to further physical evolution, because it is more difficult for natural selection to select individuals for some reason.

From book Social networks without fear for those who... the author Vinner Marina

From the book The Newest Philosophical Dictionary author Gritsanov Alexander Alekseevich

Chapter 4 Social networks What is a social network How are you not registered on Odnoklassniki.ru yet? And you don't have a Vkontakte.ru page? It's just impossible! All your friends have been there for a long time - they communicate, share new photos and breaking news looking for the lost

From the book Social Studies. Full course of preparation for the exam author Shemakhanova Irina Albertovna

INNOVATIVE SOCIAL TECHNOLOGIES - a procedurally structured set of techniques and methods aimed at studying, updating and optimizing innovation activities, as a result of which innovations are created and materialized, causing

From the author's book

3. Social relations 3.1. Social Stratification and Mobility Under social stratification(the concept was introduced by the sociologist P. A. Sorokin) is understood as the presence in society of many social formations, the representatives of which differ from each other by unequal

From the author's book

3.2. Social groups A social group is an objectively existing stable community, a set of individuals interacting in a certain way on the basis of several signs, shared expectations of each member of the group regarding others. T. Hobbes first

A social group (community) is a real-life, empirically fixed set of people, which is characterized by integrity and acts as an independent subject of social and historical action.

The emergence of various social groups is primarily associated with such phenomena as the social division of labor and the specialization of activities, and secondly, with the historically established conditions of life, and

So, a particular set of people can be considered a social group if its members have:

1. The similarity of living conditions.

2. The presence of joint activities.

3. Common needs.

4. Own culture.

5. Self-assignment to this community.

Social groups and their types and forms are distinguished by extraordinary diversity. So, they can vary both in quantitative composition (small and numerous), and in the duration of their existence (short-term - from a few minutes, and stable, existing for millennia), and in the degree of connection between the participants (stable and random, amorphous formations).

Types of social groups depending on the number

1. Small. They are characterized by a small number of participants (from 2 to 30 people), who are well acquainted with each other and are engaged in some common cause. Relationships in such a group are direct. This includes such types of elementary cells of society as a family, a group of friends, a school class, an aircraft crew, etc.

2. Large. They are numerous collections of people who occupy in social structure the same position and have common interests in this regard. Types of large social groups: stratum, class, nation, etc. At the same time, connections in such aggregates are increasingly indirect, since their number is huge.

Types of social groups depending on the nature of the interaction

1. Primary, in which the interaction of participants with each other is interpersonal, direct, implying the support of a group of peers, friends, neighbors on the porch.

2. Secondary, the interaction in which is due to the achievement of a common goal and is of a formal nature. Examples: trade unions, production batches.

Types of social groups depending on the fact of existence

1. Nominal, which are artificially constructed populations of people who are specially allocated for Examples: commuter train passengers, buyers of a certain brand of washing powder.

2. Real groups, the criterion for the existence of which are real signs (income, gender, age, profession, nationality, place of residence). Examples: women, men, children, Russians, townspeople, teachers, doctors.

Types of social groups depending on the method of organization

1. Formal groups that are created and exist only within officially recognized organizations. Examples: class at school, Dynamo football club.

2. Informal, usually arising and existing on the basis of the personal interests of the participants, which either coincide or diverge from the goals of formal groups. Examples: a circle of lovers of poetry, a club of fans of bard songs.

In addition to such a concept as a social group, there are so-called "quasi-groups". They are unstable informal collections of people who, as a rule, have an indefinite structure, norms and values. Examples: audience (concert hall, theatrical performance), fan clubs, crowd (rally, flash mob).

Thus, we can say that the true subjects of relations in society are not real people, separate individuals, but a combination of various social groups that interact with each other and whose goals and interests intersect with each other in one way or another.

A person participates in public life not as an isolated individual, but as a member of social communities - a family, a friendly company, a labor collective, a nation, a class, etc. His activities are largely determined by the activities of those groups in which he is included, as well as the interaction within groups and between groups. Accordingly, in sociology, society acts not only as an abstraction, but also as a set of specific social groups that are in a certain dependence on each other.

The structure of the whole public system, the totality of interrelated and interacting social groups and social communities, as well as social institutions and relations between them, is the social structure of society.

In sociology, the problem of dividing society into groups (including nations, classes), their interaction is one of the cardinal and is characteristic of all levels of theory.

The concept of a social group

Group is one of the main elements of the social structure of society and is a collection of people united by any essential feature - common activities, general economic, demographic, ethnographic, psychological characteristics. This concept is used in jurisprudence, economics, history, ethnography, demography, psychology. In sociology, the concept of "social group" is usually used.

Not every community of people is called a social group. If people are just in a certain place (on a bus, in a stadium), then such a temporary community can be called "aggregation". A social community that unites people on only one or a few similar grounds is also not called a group; the term "category" is used here. For example, a sociologist might categorize students aged 14 to 18 as youth; elderly people who are paid by the state allowance, provides benefits for paying utilities, - to the category of pensioners, etc.

Social group - it is an objectively existing stable community, a set of individuals interacting in a certain way on the basis of several signs, in particular, the shared expectations of each member of the group regarding others.

The concept of a group as an independent one, along with the concepts of personality (individual) and society, is already found in Aristotle. In modern times, T. Hobbes was the first to define a group as "a certain number of people united by a common interest or common cause."

Under social group it is necessary to understand any objectively existing stable set of people connected by a system of relations regulated by formal or informal social institutions. Society in sociology is considered not as a monolithic entity, but as a set of many social groups that interact and are in a certain dependence on each other. Each person during his life belongs to many such groups, among which are the family, the friendly team, the student group, the nation, and so on. The creation of groups is facilitated by the similar interests and goals of people, as well as the realization of the fact that by combining actions one can achieve significantly greater result than with individual action. At the same time, the social activity of each person is largely determined by the activities of the groups in which he is included, as well as the interaction within groups and between groups. It can be stated with full confidence that only in a group a person becomes a person and is able to find full self-expression.

The concept, formation and types of social groups

The most important elements of the social structure of society are social groups and . Being forms of social interaction, they are such associations of people whose joint, solidarity actions are aimed at meeting their needs.

There are many definitions of the concept of "social group". Thus, according to some Russian sociologists, a social group is a collection of people who have common social characteristics and perform a socially necessary function in the structure of the social division of labor and activity. The American sociologist R. Merton defines a social group as a set of individuals interacting with each other in a certain way, aware of their belonging to this group and recognized as members of this group from the point of view of others. He distinguishes three main features in a social group: interaction, membership and unity.

Unlike mass communities, social groups are characterized by:

  • sustainable interaction, contributing to the strength and stability of their existence;
  • a relatively high degree of unity and cohesion;
  • a clearly defined homogeneity of the composition, suggesting the presence of signs inherent in all members of the group;
  • the possibility of joining wider social communities as structural units.

Since each person in the course of his life is a member of a wide variety of social groups that differ in size, nature of interaction, degree of organization and many other features, it becomes necessary to classify them according to certain criteria.

There are the following types of social groups:

1. Depending on the nature of the interaction - primary and secondary (Appendix, scheme 9).

primary group, by definition, C. Cooley, is a group in which the interaction between members is direct, interpersonal in nature and has a high level of emotionality (family, school class, peer group, etc.). Carrying out the socialization of the individual, the primary group acts as a link between the individual and society.

secondary group- This is a larger group in which interaction is subordinated to the achievement of a specific goal and is formal, impersonal. In these groups, the focus is not on the personal, unique qualities of the members of the group, but on their ability to perform certain functions. Organizations (industrial, political, religious, etc.) can serve as examples of such groups.

2. Depending on the method of organization and regulation of interaction - formal and informal.

formal group- This is a group with a legal status, interaction in which is regulated by a system of formalized norms, rules, laws. These groups have a consciously set goal, normatively fixed hierarchical structure and act in accordance with the administratively established procedure (organizations, enterprises, etc.).

informal grouparises spontaneously, on the basis of common views, interests and interpersonal interactions. It is deprived of official regulation and legal status. These groups are usually led by informal leaders. Examples are friendly companies, informal associations among young people, rock music lovers, etc.

3. Depending on the belonging of individuals to them - ingroups and outgroups.

Ingroup- this is a group to which the individual feels a direct belonging and identifies it as "mine", "our" (for example, "my family", "my class", "my company", etc.).

Outgroup - this is a group to which the given individual does not belong and therefore evaluates it as “alien”, not his own (other families, another religious group, another ethnic group, etc.). Each ingroup individual has his own outgroup rating scale: from indifferent to aggressive-hostile. Therefore, sociologists propose to measure the degree of acceptance or closeness in relation to other groups according to the so-called Bogardus' "social distance scale".

Reference group - this is a real or imaginary social group, the system of values, norms and evaluations of which serves as a standard for the individual. The term was first proposed by the American social psychologist Hyman. The reference group in the system of relations "personality - society" performs two important functions: normative, being for the individual a source of norms of behavior, social attitudes and value orientations; comparative acting as a standard for the individual, allows him to determine his place in the social structure of society, evaluate himself and others.

4. Depending on the quantitative composition and form of the implementation of connections - small and large.

- this is a directly contacting small group of people united to carry out joint activities.

A small group can take many forms, but the initial ones are the "dyad" and "triad", they are called the simplest molecules small group. Dyadconsists of two people and is considered an extremely fragile association, in triad actively interact three persons, it is more stable.

The characteristic features of a small group are:

  • small and stable composition (as a rule, from 2 to 30 people);
  • spatial proximity of group members;
  • sustainability and longevity:
  • a high degree of coincidence of group values, norms and patterns of behavior;
  • intensity of interpersonal relationships;
  • a developed sense of belonging to a group;
  • informal control and information saturation in the group.

large group- this is a large group in its composition, which is created for a specific purpose and the interaction in which is mainly indirect in nature (labor collectives, enterprises, etc.). This also includes numerous groups of people who have common interests and occupy the same position in the social structure of society. For example, social-class, professional, political and other organizations.

A collective (lat. collectivus) is a social group in which all vital connections between people are mediated through socially important goals.

Characteristic features of the team:

  • combination of interests of the individual and society;
  • commonality of goals and principles that act for the members of the team as value orientations and norms of activity. The team performs the following functions:
  • subject - solution of the task for which it is created;
  • social and educational - combination of the interests of the individual and society.

5. Depending on the socially significant signs - real and nominal.

Real groups are groups identified according to socially significant criteria:

  • floor - men and women;
  • age - children, youth, adults, the elderly;
  • income - rich, poor, prosperous;
  • nationality - Russians, French, Americans;
  • marital status - married, single, divorced;
  • profession (occupation) - doctors, economists, managers;
  • place of residence - city ​​dwellers, rural dwellers.

Nominal (conditional) groups, sometimes called social categories, - are allocated for the purpose of conducting a sociological study or statistical accounting of the population (for example, to find out the number of passengers-benefits, single mothers, students receiving nominal scholarships, etc.).

Along with social groups in sociology, the concept of "quasi-group" is singled out.

A quasi-group is an informal, spontaneous, unstable social community that does not have a definite structure and system of values, in which the interaction of people is, as a rule, of a third-party and short-term nature.

The main types of quasigroups are:

The audienceis a social community united by interaction with a communicator and receiving information from him. The heterogeneity of this social formation, due to the difference in personal qualities, as well as cultural values ​​and norms of the people included in it, determines and varying degrees perception and evaluation of the information received.

- a temporary, relatively unorganized, unstructured accumulation of people united in a closed physical space by a common interest, but at the same time devoid of a clearly perceived goal and interconnected by the similarity of their emotional state. Allocate General characteristics crowds:

  • suggestibility - people in the crowd are usually more suggestible than those outside it;
  • anonymity - the individual, being in the crowd, as if merges with it, becomes unrecognizable, believing that it is difficult to “calculate” him;
  • spontaneity (contagiousness) - people in the crowd are subject to rapid transmission and change of emotional state;
  • unconsciousness - the individual feels invulnerable in the crowd, out of social control, therefore his actions are "impregnated" with collective unconscious instincts and become unpredictable.

Depending on the way the crowd is formed and the behavior of people in it, the following varieties are distinguished:

  • random crowd - an indefinite set of individuals formed spontaneously without any purpose (to watch a celebrity suddenly appear or a traffic accident);
  • conventional crowd - a relatively structured gathering of people influenced by planned predetermined norms (spectators in a theater, fans in a stadium, etc.);
  • expressive crowd - a social quasi-group formed for the personal pleasure of its members, which in itself is already a goal and result (discotheques, rock festivals, etc.);
  • acting (active) crowd - a group that performs some kind of action, which can act as: gatherings - an emotionally excited crowd gravitating towards violent actions, and revolting crowd - group characterized by particular aggressiveness and destructive actions.

In the history of the development of sociological science, various theories have developed that explain the mechanisms of crowd formation (G. Lebon, R. Turner, and others). But for all the dissimilarity of points of view, one thing is clear: to control the command of the crowd, it is important: 1) to identify the sources of the emergence of norms; 2) identify their carriers by structuring the crowd; 3) purposefully influence their creators, offering the crowd meaningful goals and algorithms for further actions.

Among quasi-groups, social circles are closest to social groups.

Social circles are social communities that are created for the purpose of exchanging information between their members.

The Polish sociologist J. Szczepanski identifies the following varieties social circles:contact - communities that constantly meet on the basis of certain conditions (interest in sports competitions, sports, etc.); professional - gathering for the exchange of information solely on a professional basis; status - generated by the exchange of information between people with the same social status(aristocratic circles, women's or men's circles, etc.); friendly - based on the joint conduct of any events (companies, groups of friends).

In conclusion, we note that quasi-groups are some transitional formations, which, with the acquisition of such features as organization, stability and structure, turn into a social group.

The study of society is based on several basic phenomena or approaches that make it possible to simplify and at the same time systematize existing connections. For example, this is the division of society into different social groups. First you need to understand what it is about. So, social groups of the population are a set of people who act as single entity actions. Moreover, they are distinguished by the presence of a unifying principle: interests, views, needs, values, etc.

Please note that social science highlights social groups and communities. What is the difference? There are several different definitions. But they all agree that social groups are characterized by a certain stability, ideological commonality, more or less regular contacts, and the availability of organizational resources. They are usually formed consciously.

What examples can be given here? These are fans of a particular football club, various professional associations that have appeared to protect members of their interests. Or entrepreneurs who are interested in bringing their products to the market at a lower cost.

At the same time, social communities, as a rule, are much larger (nation, inhabitants of a certain region, etc.). They are formed completely randomly, can be unstable, easily disintegrate. Such social formations often differ in ideological diversity. They do not have any plan of action, development. Much here is chaotic.

Nevertheless, social communities, social groups have common features. The first and second have something in common. Also, they may have the same goals, needs, etc. Let's say that passengers of the same train in the event of an accident face the same difficulties. Like social groups, social communities are different sizes, and they can also decrease and increase. In many ways, both there and there there is an element of spontaneity. Large and small social groups

Groups are small and large. A normal sociological phenomenon was the transition from one to the other due to mergers and disintegrations. Sometimes a small formation can be included in a larger one, while maintaining its complete integrity. Large social groups in modern Russian society- these are Orthodox, pensioners, fans of Putin's policy.

It can be seen that it is quite easy to confuse large social groups and their types (according to political, religious or age criteria) with communities. Such mistakes are often made even by professionals.

However large groups characterized by relative uniformity and stability. Let's say, if we compare a nation, in which people with very different needs, income levels, interests, life experience, etc., with such a group as "pensioners", then the latter will have more unifying factors. Thus, as a phenomenon of social groups, large social groups in particular have some stability.

And even large social groups are difficult to organize and control due to their size. Therefore, they are often divided into small subgroups for better understanding.

In the general concept of social groups, small social groups are also distinguished. Scientists pay attention to the fact that the phenomenon itself is quite relative in terms of numbers. So, small social groups are 2-3 people (family), and several hundred. Different understanding gives rise to conflicting interpretations.

And one more thing: existing small groups are able to unite into larger formations in order to achieve some goals. Sometimes this creates a single structure. And periodically they retain their heterogeneity, but after the achievement of the task, they again disintegrate.

What are primary social groups?

When considering the concept of social groups, types, different classifications, one cannot ignore the division into primary and secondary. What can be said about the first? They presuppose the presence of direct contacts, mutual assistance, common tasks, a certain equality. These can be friends, classmates, etc.

Secondary ones appear with further socialization. They are more formal (a group of women who gave birth in the same year in the same city, an association of lawyers, a union of dacha owners). The same person can belong to several secondary groups at the same time.

Other types

The main classifications are listed above. However, they are far from the only ones. There is a division according to the method of organization: formal and informal. The former willingly submit to public control, they usually have a plan of action, they are officially registered, they can even act as legal entities. For example, trade unions, official fan clubs of famous sports teams, etc.

Unlike them, informal ones are largely spontaneous. Their representatives themselves classify themselves as a particular group (goths, punks, fans of Hollywood action movies, esoterics), there is no control over the number, as well as a development plan. Such education can spontaneously appear and disappear, losing popularity.

Social science also considers the division according to the principle of belonging of an individual into ingroups and outgroups. The first is closely related to the concept of "mine". My family, school, class, religion, etc. That is, everything with which identification occurs.

The second category is foreign groups, another nation, religion, profession, etc. Attitude can range from indifferent to aggressive. A benevolent interest is also possible. There is also the concept of a reference group. This is a kind of education, the system of values, views and norms of which serve for the individual as a kind of standard, an example. With them, he checks his life guidelines, draws up a plan (admission to a prestigious university, an increase in income, etc.)

Depending on the social significance, real and nominal groups are distinguished. The first category includes those groups that are formed on the basis of socially significant criteria. These are gender, age, income, profession, nationality, residence, etc.

As for the nominal ones, we are talking about a rather conditional division of the population into separate groups. For example, the study plan target audience and its purchasing power suggests that you need to explore everyone who bought in such and such a store detergents. As a result, a conditional category of buyers "Asi" appears in the "Auchan" supermarket.

Nominality does not imply that the members of this group are generally aware that they were assigned to some kind of community. Since only one criterion is being studied, the people who are selected as a result of such a selection may naturally have almost nothing in common, hold different views, have different values, etc.

When studying social groups, one should also take into account such an association as a quasi-group. It may have all or most of the features of such a combination, but in fact it is formed chaotically, it does not last long, but it easily breaks up. Vivid examples are the audience on