Carried out the day before international day The anti-corruption operation of the FSB in St. Petersburg ended with the detention of a senior officer of the Main Directorate of Internal Security (GUSB) of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, who extorted a bribe of 100 million rubles, the dismissal of two of his superiors and the reform of the GUSB itself. It is this department that is responsible for combating corruption in the departments of the internal affairs bodies.

As told in the Main Investigative Committee of the TFR in St. Petersburg, the 41-year-old head of the 17th department ("West") of the regional department of own security (RUSB) GUSB MVD Russia, Yuri Timchenko tried to get from the leadership of one of the largest Russian logistics companies- OOO "Business Lines". This company had problems in September 2016, when the Main Investigative Directorate of the ICR opened a criminal case on the fact of tax evasion (Article 199 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). According to investigators, "unidentified persons" who acted in the interests of this LLC "included in tax returns for VAT for the tax periods from 2011 to 2013 knowingly false information about the right to apply tax deductions in total amount 516.103 million rubles". In addition, the TFR claims that data on fictitious expenses were entered in the declarations of the cargo carrier in these years, "reducing the taxable base for corporate income tax by 2,867,239,000 rubles." As a result, according to the TFR , "Business Lines" managed to avoid paying VAT and income tax in the amount of 1,089,551,000 rubles.

Representatives of Delovye Linii did not deny involvement in tax fraud, intending to pay off the debt, which would automatically lead to the termination of the criminal case. But the company had certain difficulties in paying its debts, since, at the request of the TFR, the court arrested 1.6 billion rubles in its accounts.

According to the investigation, Colonel Timchenko decided to take advantage of the current situation - a native of the traffic police, who rose to the rank of head of the GUSB department, stationed in St. Petersburg and controlling police activities throughout the territory Northwestern Federal District .

In November, having learned about the tax case and the arrest of the accounts of Delovye Linii, the colonel, through two intermediaries, offered the company's management to solve these problems for 100 million rubles. Moreover, he demanded to pay half of the amount no later than December 8, and to transfer the remaining money after the removal of the arrest from the settlement accounts of Business Lines.

The participants in the investigation believe that the date was not set by chance - the colonel found out through his own channels that the Main Investigative Directorate of the ICR plans to unblock accounts so that the company can pay its debts before the new year and avoid the accrual of regular fines, and decided to take advantage of the situation.

Businessmen, in turn, preferred to apply to FSB, and all their further negotiations with the police officer took place under the control of the Chekists.

On December 8, at about 20:00, in the parking lot of the Galeria shopping center on Ligovsky Prospekt, Mr. Timchenko's acquaintances - co-owner of the law office Sergey Zinovenko and businessman Konstantin Marchenkov - received a bag from a representative of Delovye Linii LLC, which should have contained 50 million rubles. In fact, only some of the bills were real, and the rest were "doll". But the bag, barely stuffed with banknotes, was placed in the trunk of their car, and the FSB special forces stepped in.

I appeal to the President of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin, to the leadership of law enforcement agencies, as well as to deputies State Duma RF.

I, Kosurov Dmitry Nikolaevich, a citizen of Russia, a resident of the city of Nizhnekamsk, the Republic of Tatarstan, I ask you to hear me and carefully consider the circumstances that led to the situation that has developed today.

Since 2008, I began to help solve crimes in the Mamshovskie organized crime group to an employee of the Criminal Investigation Department in the Republic of Tatarstan, Lieutenant Colonel Gafarov M.B. and unwittingly witnessed illegal activities Gafarova, which was expressed in the fact that this police officer planted weapons and drugs on people, falsified criminal cases, offered and provided services from avoiding criminal liability for monetary rewards, engaged in outright fraud and extortion from former members of various organized crime groups. Thus, making loud disclosures for himself, he created authority and disclosure among the employees of the UR. He organized and personally created false caches and passed them off as caches belonging to one or another organized criminal group. Thus showing the newly revealed gangs. Seeing how innocent people are periodically imprisoned before my eyes, I, knowing Gafarov’s capabilities and cynical character, for a long time I was afraid to talk about it with anyone, and even more so to contact law enforcement agencies, since I could be imprisoned or simply killed.

But, after the head of the police of the city of Kazan and other high-ranking police officers of the Republic of Tatarstan were arrested by the officers of the State Security Service of the Russian Federation in the fall of 2013, I believed that the times had changed and there were no untouchable police officers. Twice my acquaintances and I turned to the Main Security Service of the Russian Federation when I personally arrived in Moscow with statements about the illegal actions of a police officer Gafarov. We also applied to the TFR of the Russian Federation, to the FSB of the Russian Federation, to the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, to the Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation. We personally got through to Anton Stanislavovich Romeyko-Gurko, head of the department of inspections of the Main Directorate of Internal Security of the Russian Federation, where in a telephone conversation we briefly informed him about these malfeasances. After that, the curator Karimov R. arrived and said that he would come on this fact additional group. But to date, nothing has changed. On August 20, 2014, I wrote a statement to the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for the Republic of Tatarstan that I was aware of the malfeasance committed by Gafarov (the statement is attached).

Gafarov always had complaints and statements without dates and numbers, which he at the right time, pursuing his own selfish goals, used them against objectionable people or against those from whom he planned to receive a monetary reward. To my deepest surprise and disappointment, the proceedings on my application against Gafarov M.B. carried out all the same first department on a special important matters The Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for the Republic of Tatarstan, which is investigating the cases of organized crime groups, accompanied by Gafarov. I immediately realized that I couldn’t see objectivity and justice, because without calling any of the ten declared witnesses, without examining a single declared material, without satisfying my request for a polygraph (lie detector) examination, investigator Abdulmanov issued a refusal material regarding Gafarov and singled out from it materials in a separate office, filed against me, also without examining the evidence, without interviewing witnesses, a criminal case under part 1 of article 306 “For knowingly false denunciation”. This made me make an appointment with the head of the TFR for the Republic of Tatarstan, Nikolaev P.M. After listening to my arguments, Nikolaev asked in surprise the head of the First Department by the name of Krivonosov: “Why is the First Department investigating both bandits and malfeasance?” and immediately gave the order, calling his subordinates to transfer the case to the second department, which deals directly with the malfeasance of police officers. At the same time, I told Nikolaev that in the cache, which Gafarov and Karabashev organized and issued for 2001, there is a weapon that was handed over just recently, namely Kanatiev, in 2012, at the beginning of winter, a PPS 1954 automatic rifle was handed over. The sawn-off shotgun, which is in this cache, was bought by S. Lyakhov in 2012 in the Muslyumovsky district of the Republic of Tatarstan, the TT pistol was dug out in the garden near Kodintsev also in 2012. After that, at this reception, where the leadership of the TFR for the Republic of Tatarstan was present, everyone silently looked at the head of the department, Krivonosov, not knowing what to say. Most striking is that the order of the head of the TFR for the Republic of Tatarstan Nikolaev P.M. has not yet been executed and ignored, and Gafarov continues to manipulate the investigators of the first department, since he has already managed to blame them for his crimes. To date, ten witnesses confirm my testimony, and these are Shiyapov R.R., Kanatiev V.M., Mukhametshin I.R., Israfilov I.R., Osipov I.P., former police officer Sabirov B.R., lawyer who provided legal services Karabashev A. (who gave out the cache) Mucheykin D.N., Berezkin A.Yu., Borisenkov I. Chekin A., Kotushenko Yu.G. These persons fully confirm my testimony, my arguments and my correctness. Because of this, the investigator Abdulmanov still cannot charge me. Since Gafarov is still manipulating the investigators of the First Department of the ICR for the Republic of Tatarstan, the investigation took an unprecedented step in order to prevent a confrontation between me and Gafarov, and also to prevent me and the witnesses from going to court in the Kuskovskie criminal case, investigator Abdulmanov goes to court with a petition for my compulsory examination in a psychiatric clinic for a period of 20 days or more, in order to further incapacitate me and declare me mentally ill. Thus, they are trying to protect themselves and avoid punishment for falsifying evidence in a criminal case, as a result of which innocent people can go to jail. Previously, I was one of the main witnesses for the prosecution in the Mamshovskie gang, and the evidence given by me in this criminal case was considered by the investigation and the court to be sufficient and substantiated. No one suspected my inadequacy just because what I said coincided with the position of the state prosecution, and now, having tried to tell the truth, I was immediately considered mentally insane. Paradox?!..

I support all the facts stated in this statement:

SMS messages with mobile phone Gafarova,

SMS from investigator Korkin, who is investigating a criminal case on the Kuskovsky gang,

audio recordings of conversations of former and current police officers,

audio recordings of investigator Abdulmanov,

audio recordings of witnesses on various crimes committed by Gafarov,

video recordings of active police officers, video of witness Karabashev,

video recording with Gafarov's agent - Bormutov

1. call_17-32-28_IN_+79296519525 .wav(58.5 Mb)
2. continuation of the conversation with Nasevich_mpeg4.mp4(48.1 Mb)
3. Conversation with Davletshin regarding cache_mpeg4.mp4(37.3 Mb)
4. conversation with the deputy head of the 6th department, Nasevich, regarding the cache_mpeg4.mp4(69.3 Mb)

Link for downloading files: http://files.mail.ru/B89F DB6E61914658A6D477564417B BDB

1. Conversation with employee uur Vafin.m4a(55.3 Mb)

Among the ten main directions of development Russian Federation including the fight against crime and corruption.

The issue of strengthening the rule of law in the system of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation is still one of the highest priorities. In this regard, the main efforts are focused on two areas: identifying and suppressing the facts of illegal activities of employees of the internal affairs bodies and preemptive impact on teams of employees in order to prevent these facts.

Before we punish, we will understand.

The Main Directorate of Internal Security is an operational unit within the structure of the central office of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, personally subordinate to the Minister of Internal Affairs.

The activities of the Glavka are connected with combating corruption in the system of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, state protection of employees, federal civil servants and their relatives. The most important task of the internal security service is to check complaints about illegal actions of police officers coming from citizens.

About what work is being done at the departmental level to search for objective truth and establish the circumstances of emergencies in situations where an employee of the internal affairs bodies becomes their alleged culprit, we talked with the head of the Department for organizing inspections and implementing operational information of the Main Directorate of Internal Security (GUSB) of the Ministry of Internal Affairs Russian Police Colonel Anton Stanislavovich Romeiko-Gurko

Anton Stanislavovich, for such a seemingly short period, based on the opinion of social monitoring, with your appointment to the position, since October 2012, big job, there have been significant results. How do you assess the vital situation in the unit entrusted to you, including for the future, were there personnel changes, any innovations have been introduced in the line of our own security activities, and is it possible to at least briefly “look” at that very component of the curve of crimes and punishments, and what is the right thing to do in cases where assistance is needed in state protection, including from an unfair judgment?

It must be said that the work of the unit entrusted to me is not just to consider the appeals, applications and other information received by the Department about illegal actions and manifestations of corruption among employees, civil servants and employees of the systems of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. As well as constant analysis of situations related to this area of ​​activity.

I would like to note with satisfaction the efficient team. Employees have the highest professional level All of them have been tested for durability. Worked in various services. No specially organized changes with my appointment have occurred and are not planned. In my opinion, this is an absolutely established work team. Many of the employees once started, as we say, “from the ground”.

As for innovations, no global changes have taken place, except for the redistribution of responsibilities between departments. A number of measures have also been taken to tighten control over the quality and timing of inspections.

In order to understand the scale of public attention to the problems of internal affairs, I will indicate that just for last year Glavk received more than 19.5 thousand complaints and statements from citizens, as well as other information, plus almost 53 thousand to the territorial subdivisions of its own security (PSB) of the internal affairs bodies. None of the received appeals is left without attention: each is registered, considered, and a decision is made on each appeal. I would like to draw your attention to the fact that there is only 47% of substantiated information that was confirmed during the 400 inspections carried out by the Office. For the current period of 2013, the Department has already received 7,500 applications from citizens. A considerable number of appeals come from the regions. We pay special attention to those subjects in which the number of appeals of citizens to their own safety is decreasing, despite the fact that in the same regions the number of appeals to the central apparatus of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia is growing. This indicates either the low quality of on-site inspections, or an inattentive attitude towards work with applicants, or, even worse, distrust of local authority internal affairs.

Appeals are different. Some of them are within our competence, and depending on the significance, we either carry out verification activities ourselves, or organize them on the ground, but always with our control of the results.

In addition to conducting inspections, we are also engaged in analytical work on the applications received from citizens through the line of our own security. In less than half a year in 2013, the employees of the Department conducted 184 independent checks, after which 29 materials were sent to the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation. In 5 cases, criminal cases were initiated. During the same period last year, 12 were initiated. On the basis of one audit material, seven criminal cases were initiated at once under the article of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, which provides for liability for taking a bribe.

In addition, according to the results of independent inspections, 129 employees of internal affairs bodies were brought to disciplinary responsibility this year. Of these, 6 employees were dismissed from the police department.

An example of the work of the GUSB is the initiation of a number of criminal cases against individual heads of the traffic police in the Ryazan region for systemic abuses of power.

Question: Commenting given statistics, it can be said that most of the appeals and applications received by the GUSB are related to the illegal actions of the leadership of the Department of Internal Affairs?

Not certainly in that way. A significant volume of complaints relates to violations committed by employees of the internal affairs bodies in the investigation of criminal offenses, inspections of the financial and economic activities of commercial structures, security traffic. The largest number complaints were received against the actions of traffic police officers, the criminal investigation department, district commissioners, employees of the UEBiPK and investigative units.

It should be noted that both active and former employees Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. Most often, in their appeals, they point to unlawful dismissals of them from the police department, non-payment of the required salary.

Q: How long does it take to process applications?

Each of the applications received has a statutory deadline for consideration. So, for example, issues, the solution of which is not within the competence of a subdivision of the system of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, are sent within 7 days from the date of registration to the appropriate government agency or an official whose competence includes the solution of the issues raised. In this case, the citizen is notified in writing about the redirection of the material.

Appeals received by the internal affairs body in accordance with its competence are considered within thirty days from the date of registration.

The term for their consideration may be extended by no more than thirty days with simultaneous notification of the citizen who sent the appeal.

According to information containing facts of illegal activities of employees of the internal affairs bodies, an inspection is appointed and carried out.

If signs of corpus delicti are found in the actions of an internal affairs officer, appeals and verification materials on it are sent to the investigative divisions of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for a decision to be made in accordance with the current legislation of the Russian Federation.

The legislation does not allow us to conduct independent checks when the applicant appeals the procedural decisions made or reports about the improper (in his opinion) investigation of criminal cases. In this case, the appeal is either sent to the appropriate prosecutor's office, or the Investigation Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia is involved in the verification.

Why are there field visits? Is it due to the poor quality of inspections carried out in the regions or are there other reasons?

All independent checks at the request of citizens or other information are carried out only by order of the Minister of Internal Affairs and the leadership of the GUSB.

Glavka, like any division, has its own competence. Basically, on-site inspections are appointed in cases where the appeal concerns complaints against the heads of internal affairs bodies of the constituent entities of the Federation (in this case, it is incorrect and wrong for these events to be carried out by those whose actions or facts are being appealed) or if the information indicated in the appeal may have a large public resonance.

In the language of numbers specific gravity"Police" crime in the total mass of crimes is very insignificant (approximately 0.1 - 0.2%). However, the very fact of its existence causes serious concern, since such crimes are of increased public danger and undermine people's faith in the law, people's belief that the state can actually defend their interests. Therefore, the work of the Department is not only of particular importance within the department, it implements the most important social and socio-political function - restoring justice and trust in police officers. And now we can say that we are coping well with it. However, unfortunately, there is still a lot of work to be done. The matter is that it is impossible to consider bodies of internal affairs separately from a society. The police are part of the Russian society. So, for example, everyone remembers the recently successfully carried out operation by the GUSB officers to identify and detain a group of employees of the capital's traffic police who organized the sale of driver's licenses without training and passing exams. Of course, there are violations on the part of employees. But none of the means mass media did not draw attention to the fact that there were many buyers for the "left rights" in our society. In this case, the principle “demand creates supply” worked. After all, buying such a driver's license, woe - drivers risk not only their health, but also the lives of their loved ones.

The loud confrontation between Oleg Ivanov, the head of the Levashovo settlement, and Sergey Fedorov, who claims to remain the head of the local administration, has been going on for almost a year. Every month the story is overgrown with new details, litigation and unpleasant facts, which may well result in the initiation of a criminal case, which for some reason the Investigative Committee is stubbornly slowing down.

Who quarreled with whom?

In the eyes of the residents of the village, already entangled in the intricacies of domestic legislation, the conflict is more like a personal quarrel between Ivanov and Fedorov, and this is how it is periodically presented in the media.

If we follow this logic, then the dismissal of Anton Romeiko-Gurko, deputy head of the Main Directorate of Internal Security (GUSB) of the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs, can also be presented as a personal revenge of Minister Vladimir Kolokoltsev. Like, the head of the law enforcement agency was angry that a high-ranking security officer, Yuri Timchenko, was detained in St. Petersburg, who demanded 100 million rubles from businessmen for his patronage. And since the detainee was subordinate to Romeiko-Gurko, the minister found a convenient excuse to send the deputy head of the Main Directorate of the Main Directorate of the Main Directorate of the Interior Ministry of Russia with things to the exit.

In Levashovo, of course, the scope is smaller. The entire budget of the village with a population of almost 4,500 people for 2016 amounted to about 73 million rubles - a quarter less than the “werewolf” Timchenko wanted to receive from businessmen. But the actions of a senior official municipality, heads of Ivanov, aimed at removing from office a local official Fedorov, who was convicted of violating the Law on Combating Corruption No. 273-FZ and federal law“On municipal service in the Russian Federation”, in fact, are no different from the recent order of the Minister of the Ministry of Internal Affairs.

And try to object to the fact that Vladimir Kolokoltsev reasonably fired Romeiko-Gurko, who allowed his direct subordinate Timchenko to become a "werewolf".

Save and fire

Today, it is no longer so important whose support both sides of the conflict in Levashovo are trying to enlist. Sonorous names and federal party brands flash in the press.

It all started with the fact that the head of the local administration, Sergei Fedorov, at the beginning of 2015, liquidated the Levashovskoye municipal state institution, dismissing the director Olesya Ostrovskaya. And then he created an institution of the same name, which was headed by a friend of Fedorov's wife, Natalya Zabarina, who held the position of chief accountant in the liquidated MKU. That is, the "alien" Ostrovsky was changed to "their" Tatyana Orlova.

At the same time, the municipal council (and the head of the local administration is accountable and controlled by law to it) was not informed of the need and reasons for the liquidation of the MKU, and the decision to create an institution of the same name, as sources told Konkretno.ru, did not take.

Ivanov's reaction was predictable. He tried to find justice for Fedorov along the party line. However, the local official was more favored by the former regional leadership of United Russia than Ivanov. In addition, Sergei Fedorov could rely on almost half of the municipal deputies. Opponents believe that these chosen ones depend on his “pocket” political council and an authoritative businessman of a local stature.

On February 25, 2016, an "initiative group" of local people's deputies spoke at a meeting of the municipal council with an appeal to remove Ivanov from his resignation. Note that the “deleted person” himself was on sick leave at that time. According to the deputy Valery Svirida, the head of the Levashovo settlement could violate anti-corruption legislation, since, being a municipal employee, he allegedly headed a commercial firm. The “initiative group” also notified the governor of St. Petersburg about the desire to remove Oleg Ivanov.

After that, a series of single pickets were held in front of the administration building of the Vyborgsky District, the Mariinsky Palace and the Smolny. A few participants, on behalf of all the inhabitants of the village, demanded to "save Levashovo" and send "Ivanov to resign." Activist Anna Eropkina even told reporters that "if the authorities remain inactive," then the people will come out to a "large rally." However, for some reason, no protest events were noticed in Levashovo itself. And Ivanov publicly insisted that no commercial activities is not involved and the prosecutor's office that conducted the inspection did not reveal any violations on his part.

Husband and wife - power and money

However, the activities of the “initiative group” of municipal deputies and individual activists become clear if we turn to official documents. In January and February 2016, meetings of the commission on compliance with the requirements for official conduct of municipal employees and conflict resolution under the local administration of Levashovo were held.

According to Fedorov, the question was considered whether there were signs of a violation of anti-corruption legislation in the fact that his wife, who previously held the position of chief accountant in the liquidated MKU Levashovskoye, became deputy director in a new institution of the same name. At the same time, Levashovskoye is an economic structure subordinate to the local administration.

The municipal commission did not find anything criminal in the fact that the wife is responsible for finances in an organization that is controlled by her husband. As I did not see anything illegal in the fact that the MKU is headed by Tatyana Orlova.

Here is the committee public service and personnel policy Smolny, having reviewed these protocols, found: the chairman and secretary of the commission "are directly subordinate to the head of the local administration of the municipality of the village of Levashovo S. N. Fedorova." Therefore, any decision with their participation "is considered incompetent."

As for the employment of his wife, appointing her in 2012 as the chief accountant of the Levashovsky MKU, Fedorov was obliged to notify the representative of the employer (employer) in advance - the head of the Levashovo settlement Ivanov. However, he did not do this, in which Smolny saw "a violation of Article 11 of the federal law" On Combating Corruption ".

A similar violation was noted in an official letter sent from the committee addressed to Ivanov and to the St. Tatyana Orlova). And since questions arise under both protocols of the municipal commission, the official Fedorov himself must make the final decision.

Prosecutor's verdict and more

No sooner had the picketers handed over the posters to the warehouse demanding that Ivanov be dismissed than the prosecutor's office of the Vyborgsky district, on the basis of a letter from Smolny, issued on April 29, 2016, a submission No. 0808/16 on the elimination of violations of the requirements of the legislation on combating corruption in Levashovo.

In particular, the supervisory authority found that when concluding a contract for the position of head of the local administration, Fedorov undertook to notify in writing the head of the Levashovo settlement Ivanov "of personal interest in the performance of official duties that could lead to a conflict of interest, and take steps to prevent such a conflict.” However, when initiating consideration of a possible conflict of interest between Fedorov and his wife, Natalya Zabarina, and the director of the Moscow State University, Tatyana Orlova, the official did not inform the head of the Moscow Region about this, which violated Art. 11 of the Law on Combating Corruption, paragraph 11, part 1, art. 12 of the federal law "On municipal service in the Russian Federation" and clause 2.2.19 of the contract.

The prosecutor's office noted that there was Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 821, according to which the commission could not include persons subordinate to the applicant who wished to consider the issue of a possible conflict of interest. And in this case, Fyodorov's deputy and a leading specialist of the local administration sat on the commission. The official's actions were qualified as "improper performance of his official duties and ignorance of the requirements of the current legislation on combating corruption."

The prosecutor of the Vyborgsky district, Dmitry Burdov, ordered Fedorov to take immediate measures to eliminate the causes and conditions that contributed to the identified violations. Namely, to form a new composition of the commission and bring the guilty officials to disciplinary responsibility.

At the end of May, the municipal council of the village of Levashovo and directly to the deputy Valery Svirida (who, as we remember, accused Ivanov of possible manifestations of corruption) received a letter No. 07-134 / 2504 from the governor of St. Petersburg. In it, Georgy Poltavchenko pointed out that “having considered the appeal of a group of deputies dated February 26, 2016 on the initiative to remove the head of the inner-city municipality of St. Petersburg, Levashovo settlement, and the documents attached to it, I object to the removal of Oleg Dmitrievich Ivanov.”

Until you take out the chair

What happened next was predictable. Ivanov sued Fedorov and filed a lawsuit in court for early termination of the contract with the head of the local administration. Moreover, additional grounds were revealed to say goodbye to the local official.

So, for example, a certain Ishutin turned to the police after learning that service contracts were drawn up for him for several years, money was transferred to bank card, with which the leadership of the MKU "Levashovsky" and officials local administration. Interviewing witnesses and collecting additional information it seems that the investigative department of the Vyborgsky district of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Directorate of Russia for St. Petersburg was engaged.

On 06/02/2016, the order of the head of the Moscow Region appeared on the dismissal of the "corrupt official" Fedorov, as a result of which the conflict turned, let's say, into a power plane. A local official sued, refused to transfer cases and vacate the administration building. And the acting head of the local administration, Yelizaveta Taranyuk, was forced to break into the premises with the help of police and security officers involved, while receiving bodily injuries.

For the sake of objectivity, we will report that half of the deputies of the municipal council did not agree with Ivanov's order.

Encouraged by the sudden support, Sergei Fedorov organized the re-introduction of himself into the Unified State Register of Legal Entities and again gained access to budget money. However, the joy was short-lived. The prosecutor's office of the Vyborgsky district saw in his actions a violation of article 170.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (Falsification of a single state register legal entities, register owners valuable papers or depositary accounting system) and sent a submission to the Investigative Committee on the adoption of a decision on the criminal prosecution of a local official.

On September 26, 2016, the Vyborgsky District Court, having considered case No. 2a-11830/2016, refused Fedorov to challenge the submission of the district and city prosecutor's offices to cancel the resolution of the local administration No. 22 of March 22, 2013, No. settlement of conflicts of interest of municipal employees. In other words, the fact of violations of the requirements of anti-corruption legislation was established in court.

However, this did not prevent Fedorov from winning another trial in October - to terminate the contract, which does not return him to his familiar chair. The Anti-Corruption Law unequivocally interprets - a municipal employee exposed to such offenses is subject to dismissal.

Fedorov does not let up, and in just a few days he will try to prove his case at the next court.

Is the investigation going nowhere?

It is possible that it was this conflict that prompted the prosecutor's office of the Vyborgsky district to carefully read the charters of the municipalities Parnassus, Sampsonievskoye and the village of Levashovo.

Two months ago, the supervisory agency conducted a total anti-corruption check of the regulatory legal acts that are being considered or have already been adopted in the municipalities. As a result, 10 documents were identified that do not comply with the current legislation and contain corruption factors. The statutes of all tested municipalities require amendments.

However, the prosecutor's activity has not yet led to the solution of the painful “Levashov question”.

I am struck by the excessive slowness of the Investigative Committee, - Nikolai Smoktiy, the former head of the municipality of the Moscow Region Vasilevsky, told the correspondent of Konkretno.ru. - Law No. 273-FZ directly applies to municipal employees, and the application and removal disciplinary action determined labor law. But, in my opinion, the powers of the municipal council extend only to the appointment of the head of administration, but not to dismissal in terms of violations labor relations. This is already the prerogative of the head of the MO of the village of Levashovo. The President talks about the need to fight corruption everywhere, law enforcement agencies detain federal officials, governors, high-ranking security officials and for some reason cannot cope with a municipal clerk in a small village. Like this? The police have four KUSP at once for initiating criminal cases - No. 4503 of 02.02.2016, No. 4511 of 02.02.2016, No. 12910 of 03.24.2016 and No. 34032 of 08.03.2015, in the department of the Investigative Committee of the Vyborg District - materials of two checks: 252 -pr-16 dated February 25, 2016 and 252-pr-16 dated March 4, 2016. And at the exit - indecisive marking time.

In fact, if we do not consider the story with Levashovo in the variant "how Oleg Dmitrievich (Ivanov) quarreled with Sergei Nikolaevich (Fedorov)", the thought suggests itself that executive branch in the village is concentrated in "family" hands. pumped through them budget resources, personal well-being is built, impunity is demonstrated and, perhaps, even a dubious ability to "solve" problems with law enforcement. And one more important detail - any attempts to besiege a local official are presented as a desire to strike at the reputation of United Russia. And for a large party - Levashovo is the size of a pinhead, and it is not so important who "clubfoot" him.

You see, the saddest thing in this situation is that residents are beginning to think that Fedorov's personal opinion may be above the law, - sums up Nikolai Smoktiy.

It seems that the Investigative Committee does not agree with him ...

Igor Timofeev, Concrete.ru

The FSB operation in St. Petersburg, carried out on the eve of the International Anti-Corruption Day, ended with the detention of a senior officer of the Main Directorate of Internal Security (GUSB) of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, who extorted a bribe of 100 million rubles, the dismissal of two of his bosses and the reform of the GUSB itself. It is this department that is responsible for combating corruption in the departments of the internal affairs bodies.

As told in the Main Investigative Committee of the TFR in St. Petersburg, the 41-year-old head of the 17th department ("West") of the regional department of own security (RUSB) GUSB MVD Russian Yuri Timchenko tried to get from the leadership of one of the largest Russian logistics companies - Delovye Linii LLC. This company had problems in September 2016, when the Main Investigative Directorate of the ICR opened a criminal case on the fact of tax evasion (Article 199 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). According to the investigation, “unidentified persons” acting in the interests of this LLC “included in their VAT returns for the tax periods from 2011 to 2013 deliberately false information about the right to apply tax deductions in the total amount of 516.103 million rubles.” In addition, the Investigative Committee claims that data on fictitious expenses were entered in the cargo carrier's declarations in these years, "reducing the taxable base for corporate income tax by 2,867,239,000 rubles." As a result, according to the TFR, "Business Lines" managed to avoid paying VAT and income tax in the amount of 1,089,551,000 rubles.

Representatives of Delovye Linii did not deny involvement in tax fraud, intending to pay off the debt, which would automatically lead to the termination of the criminal case. But the company had certain difficulties in paying its debts, since, at the request of the TFR, the court arrested 1.6 billion rubles in its accounts.

According to the investigation, Colonel Timchenko decided to take advantage of the current situation - a native of the traffic police, who rose to the rank of head of the GUSB department, stationed in St. Petersburg and controlling police activities throughout the territory Northwestern Federal District .

In November, having learned about the tax case and the arrest of the accounts of Delovye Linii, the colonel, through two intermediaries, offered the company's management to solve these problems for 100 million rubles. Moreover, he demanded to pay half of the amount no later than December 8, and to transfer the remaining money after the removal of the arrest from the settlement accounts of Business Lines.

The participants in the investigation believe that the date was not set by chance - the colonel found out through his own channels that the Main Investigative Directorate of the ICR plans to unblock accounts so that the company can pay its debts before the new year and avoid the accrual of regular fines, and decided to take advantage of the situation.

Businessmen, in turn, preferred to apply to FSB, and all their further negotiations with the police officer took place under the control of the Chekists.

On December 8, at about 20:00, in the parking lot of the Galeria shopping center on Ligovsky Prospekt, Mr. Timchenko's acquaintances - co-owner of the law office Sergey Zinovenko and businessman Konstantin Marchenkov - received a bag from a representative of Delovye Linii LLC, which should have contained 50 million rubles. In fact, only some of the bills were real, and the rest were "doll". But the bag, barely stuffed with banknotes, was placed in the trunk of their car, and the FSB special forces stepped in.