Booklet in the open office. Text Documents (Writer)

1. Rejection of Godunov by the majority of the population, since he was not Rurikovich.

2. Assistance to False Dmitry 1 "from outside" - from interested persons within the country and beyond its borders from Europe.

3. The lack of unanimity in the ruling elite, and the mediocre rule of Godunov.

4. Faith of the Russian people in the "real" "correct tsar"

Reasons for rejection by society:

The people were indignant. Absolutely the entire population of the country was angry with the king. Opinions began to appear more and more often among the people that only the overthrow of False Dmitry 1 could stop the disorder in the country. In addition to the common people, the noble boyars were also dissatisfied with the tsar, who began to prepare a revolt to overthrow the objectionable monarch. As a result, the boyar conspiracy was implemented. As a result, False Dmitry I was overthrown.

The uprising in Moscow in May 1606.

Moscow uprising - an uprising of the townspeople on May 27, 1606 in Moscow against False Dmitry I. During the uprising, False Dmitry was killed, Vasily Shuisky was proclaimed the new tsar.

The uprising began after the sound of the alarm on the bell tower of the monastery church of Elijah the Prophet in Kitai-Gorod, made on the orders of Shuisky. After the blow, the crowd rushed to the Kremlin and to the courtyards where the Polish pans with their retinue were standing. The Shuiskys, Golitsyn, Tatishchev entered Red Square, accompanied by about 200 people armed with sabers, reeds and spears. Shuisky shouted that "Lithuania" was trying to kill the tsar, and demanded that the townspeople rise up in his defense. The cunning did its job, excited Muscovites rushed to beat and rob the Poles. At that time, Stanislav Nemoevsky was in Moscow, who in his notes cited a list of names of those who fell under the hammer of the Moscow rebellion; 524 Poles were buried. In the Kremlin, False Dmitry was killed, his body was burned.

5. Civil war and foreign invasion of Russia in 1606-1618.

Board of V. Shuisky, his domestic and foreign policy.

From 1604 to 1605, Vasily Ivanovich Shuisky was in opposition to False Dmitry I. However, after the death of Boris Godunov in June 1605, he went over to the side of the impostor. At the same time, Shuisky twice led conspiracies against False Dmitry. After the first conspiracy was exposed, Vasily Ivanovich was sentenced to death, but then pardoned - in need of support, False Dmitry returned Shuisky to Moscow. As a result of the second conspiracy in 1606, which ended in a Moscow popular uprising, False Dmitry I was killed.

After his death, the party of Moscow boyars "shouted out" Shuisky as king (May 19, 1606). In exchange for this, Vasily IV undertook an obligation to the Boyar Duma to significantly limit his powers.

Internal and foreign policy Vasily Shuisky

Almost immediately after the accession of Shuisky, rumors spread that Tsarevich Dmitry was alive. One of his supporters, Ivan Isaevich Bolotnikov, raised a popular uprising in the autumn of 1606, which engulfed more than seventy cities in the south and south-west of Russia.

In 1607, the Bolotnikov uprising was crushed. In the same year, Vasily Shuisky, in order to enlist further support from the boyars and consolidate the forces of the ruling class, issued the Code of Peasants, which historians have described as "a firm beginning of serfdom."

However, as early as August 1607, a new Polish intervention began. In June 1608, False Dmitry II settled in the village of Tushino near Moscow. This was the beginning of a new siege of Moscow. Gradually, the power of False Dmitry increased, and dual power was actually established in the country.

In order to resist the "Tushino thief", Tsar Vasily concluded an agreement with Sweden in February 1608, according to which the Swedish troops undertook to take the side of the Russian Tsar in exchange for possession of the Karelian parish. Such an act caused natural discontent on the part of various segments of the population. In addition, he violated earlier agreements with the Poles and gave the Polish king Sigismund III a pretext for an open invasion.

From the end of 1608, a people's liberation movement began against the Polish intervention. During this period, Shuisky's position became rather precarious. But thanks to his nephew Skopin-Shuisky, who commanded the Russian-Swedish troops, the tsar was able to repulse the Poles. In March 1610, the Tushino people were defeated, Moscow was liberated, and False Dmitry II fled.

The overthrow of the king

After the defeat of False Dmitry II, the unrest did not stop. The difficult position of Shuisky in Moscow was exacerbated by the intensified struggle for power. Vasily Galitsin and Prokopiy Lyapunov made attempts to raise the people against the incumbent tsar. At the same time, under unclear circumstances, Skopin-Shuisky died suddenly.

On June 24, 1610, Shuisky's troops were defeated by the Polish army under the command of hetman Stanislav Zolkiewski. There was a danger that the Polish prince Vladislav would take the Russian throne. Shuisky could not oppose anything to the Polish onslaught, for which he was deposed by the Moscow boyars in July 1610. Vasily Shuisky was forcibly tonsured a monk together with his wife, and after hetman Stanislav Zholkievsky entered Moscow, they were transferred to Warsaw, where he died while in prison.

Bolotnikov's uprising

The beginning of the uprising

In the summer of 1606, one of the largest peasant uprisings in feudal Russia began in Seversk Ukraine. The main force of the uprising was the enslaved peasants and serfs. Together with them, the Cossacks, townspeople and archers of the border (Ukrainian) cities rose up against the feudal khnet.

It was not by chance that the uprising began in the southwest of the Russian state. Runaway peasants and serfs gathered here in large numbers, and the surviving participants in the uprising of Khlopok sought refuge. The population of this region, in particular the population of the vast and populous Komaritskaya volost, located not far from the border, had already opposed Godunov and supported False Dmitry I. Boris Godunov responded to this with the complete ruin of the volost. In such a situation, a new uprising could easily arise. An outstanding role in the Bolotnikov uprising was played by the peasants of the Komaritskaya volost, which became one of the main centers of the movement. The townspeople also took an active part in it.

Together with the Russian peasantry, the working masses of the multinational population of the Middle Volga - the Mari, Mordvins, Chuvashs, Tatars - also opposed the feudal system.

Ivan Isaevich Bolotnikov was a military servant of Prince Telyatevsky, which helped him acquire professional skills and knowledge of military affairs. In his youth, Bolotnikov fled from Telyatevsky to the steppe to the Cossacks. He was captured in Wild Pole by the Tatars, who sold him as a slave to Turkey, where Bolotnikov became a galley slave. He was released from slavery during the defeat of the Turks in sea ​​battle and brought to Venice. From here, through Germany and Poland, he returned to his homeland. In the summer of 1606, he appeared on the “Moscow frontier” at a time when a popular movement was rapidly growing in Seversk Ukraine, of which he became the leader. The surviving testimonies of contemporaries depict Bolotnikov as a courageous, energetic leader, a man capable of sacrificing his life for the cause of the people, a talented commander.

Trip to Moscow. The uprising, which began in the summer of 1606, quickly spread to new areas. The population of towns and villages on the southern outskirts of the Russian state joined the rebels.

In July 1606, Bolotnikov began a campaign against Moscow from Putivl through the Komaritskaya volost. In August, near Kromy, the rebels won a major victory over the troops of Shuisky; she opened the way to Oryol. Another center of unfolding military operations was Yelets, which was of great strategic importance, and joined the rebels. The attempt of the tsarist troops besieging Yelets to take the city ended in failure. The victory of the rebels near Yelets and Kromy ends the first stage of the campaign against Moscow.

On September 23, 1606, Bolotnikov won a victory near Kaluga, where the main forces of Shuisky's army were concentrated. This event was of great importance for the further course of the struggle. It opened the way for the rebels to Moscow, caused the uprising to spread to new large areas, and involved new sections of the population in the uprising.

In autumn, service landowners joined Bolotnikov's detachments advancing towards the capital. The Ryazan nobles-landlords came led by Grigory Sumbulov and Prokopy Lyapunov, and the Tula and Venevs came under the leadership of the centurion Istoma Pashkov. The increase in Bolotnikov's army at the expense of noble squads played a negative role. The nobles joined Bolotnikov only out of a desire to use the peasant movement as a means to fight the government of Tsar Vasily Shuisky. The social interests of the nobility were opposed to the interests of the bulk of the rebels.

The goals of the rebels: The main task The uprising was the destruction of feudal relations, the elimination of feudal exploitation and oppression. This was the meaning of the appeals that Bolotnikov made in his "sheets" (proclamations) to the "boyar serfs" and the poor of Moscow and other cities. Bolotnikov's calls boiled down to the fact that the rebellious townspeople "beat the boyars ... guests and all merchants", and the peasants would deal with the feudal lords in the countryside, seize their lands and eliminate serfdom. The political slogan of the Bolotnikov uprising was the proclamation of "Tsar Dmitry" as the tsar. Faith in him was inherent not only to ordinary participants in the uprising, but also to Bolotnikov himself, who called himself only the “great governor” of “Tsar Dmitry”. This ideal "Tsar Dmitry" had nothing to do with the Polish protege False Dmitry I. The slogan of a "good" tsar was a kind of peasant utopia.

Expanding the territory of the uprising. During the campaign against Moscow, new cities and regions joined the rebels. First, the Seversk, Polish and Ukrainian cities (located on the southwestern border of the Russian state) joined the rebels, and then the Ryazan and coastal cities (covering Moscow from the south); later, the uprising engulfed the cities that lay near the Lithuanian border - Dorogobuzh, Vyazma, Roslavl, the Tver suburbs, the cities beyond the Okka - Kaluga, etc., the grassroots cities - Murom, Arzamas, etc. By the time Bolotnikov's troops arrived in Moscow, over 70 cities.

Simultaneously with the Bolotnikov uprising, a struggle is unfolding in the northeast in the cities of the Vyatka-Perm region, in the northwest - in Pskov and in the southeast - in Astrakhan. A common feature of the events in the cities of all three regions was the struggle between the upper and lower strata of the settlement, which was the result of class contradictions within the urban population. In the cities of the Vyatka-Perm region in 1606, the population of the cities cracked down on representatives of the tsarist administration, who were sent here to collect "subsistence" people and cash taxes. At the same time, there were protests of the townspeople against the top of the settlement, in particular the elders, who were elected from among the "best people".

The most acute and striking was the struggle in Pskov. Here she unfolded between the "big" and "smaller" people. The struggle of the Pskov "lesser" people had a pronounced patriotic character. The "smaller" people very resolutely opposed the plans of the traitors - the "big" people who intended to give Pskov to the Swedes. The open struggle of "big" and "smaller" people began in the second half of 1606, but it ended much later than the suppression of the Bolotnikov uprising.

One of the largest centers of struggle during the Bolotnikov uprising was Astrakhan. The Astrakhan events went far beyond the chronological framework of the Bolotnikov uprising. The government managed to suppress this movement only in 1614, while the beginning of an open struggle in Astrakhan dates back to the last year of Godunov's reign. Astrakhan was one of the most persistent centers of the struggle. The uprising in the city was directed not only against the nobles, but also against merchants. The driving force of the Astrakhan uprising was the poorest part of the urban population (serfs, yaryzhki, working people), in addition, archers and Cossacks played an active role in the uprising. The “princes” nominated by the Astrakhan lower classes (one serf and the other a plowed peasant) were fundamentally different from such impostors as False Dmitry I and later False Dmitry II, who were proteges of foreign interventionists.

The lack of communication between the rebel population of individual cities once again emphasizes the spontaneous nature of the Bolotnikov uprising.

Siege of Moscow. Advancing from Kaluga, the rebels defeated the troops of Vasily Shuisky near the village of Troitskoye (near Kolomna) and in October approached Moscow. The siege of Moscow was the climax of the uprising. The situation in the besieged capital was extremely tense due to the aggravation of class contradictions among the population of Moscow. Even before the arrival of Bolotnikov, the government, fearing the masses, locked itself in the Kremlin. The siege further aggravated the situation. Proclamations ("lists") of Ivan Bolotnikov appeared in Moscow, in which he called on the population to surrender the city. Bolotnikov sent his faithful people to Moscow, before whom he set the task of rousing the masses to the struggle. However, already in this period, the weak sides of the uprising had an effect, which then led to its decline and suppression.

Bolotnikov's detachments were neither homogeneous in their class composition, nor united in their organization. Their main core was made up of peasants, serfs and Cossacks, who in the future remained loyal to Bolotnikov and fought to the end. The nobles who joined Bolotnikov as he moved towards Moscow changed at a certain stage of the uprising and went over to the side of the government of Vasily Shuiskaya.

Bolotnikov's army besieging Moscow numbered about 100 thousand people in its ranks. It broke up into semi-independent detachments, which had their governors at the head (Sumbulov, Lyapunov, Pashkov, Bezzubtsev). Ivan Bolotnikov was a "great governor" who exercised supreme command.

Shuisky's government took a number of measures to decompose Bolotnikov's army. As a result, Bolotnikov was betrayed by random fellow travelers and noble-landlord elements - the Ryazan people, led by Lyapunov and Sumbulov. Later Istoma Pashkov cheated on Bolotnikov. This was a major success for Vasily Shuisky in the fight against Bolotnikov.

The defeat of Bolotnikov near Moscow. On November 27, Vasily Shuisky managed to defeat Bolotnikov, and on December 2, he won the decisive battle near the village of Kotly. The defeat of Bolotnikov near Moscow occurred as a result of a change in the balance of forces of the opposing sides. At the end of November, Shuisky received a large reinforcement: the Smolensk, Rzhev and other regiments came to his aid. Bolotnikov’s army also underwent changes that weakened it: by this time, the betrayal of Istoma Pashkov, who went over to Shuisky’s side on November 27 along with his detachment, belongs to this time. The defeat of Bolotnikov on December 2 radically changed the situation in the country: it meant the lifting of the siege of Moscow, the transfer of the initiative to the governor Shuisky. The tsar brutally dealt with the captured participants in the uprising. However, the struggle of the rebellious peasants and serfs did not stop.

Kaluga period of the uprising. After the defeat near Moscow, Kaluga and Tula became the main bases of the uprising. The area covered by the uprising, not only did not decrease, but, on the contrary, expanded, including the cities of the Volga region. In the Volga region, Tatars, Mordovians, Mari and other peoples came out against the feudal lords. Thus, the struggle went on a large territory. The situation was especially acute in the Ryazan-Bryansk region and in the Middle Volga region, the struggle did not die out in the Novgorod-Pskov region, in the North and in Astrakhan. In addition, the movement that arose on the Terek, headed by the impostor "prince" Peter, the imaginary son of Fyodor Ivanovich (this name was taken by Ilya Gorchakov, who came from the townspeople of the city of Murom), by the beginning of 1607 outgrew the boundaries of a purely Cossack uprising and merged with the Bolotnikov uprising. The Shuisky government sought to suppress all centers and centers of the uprising. Bolotnikov was besieged in Kaluga by Shuisky's troops. The unsuccessful siege of Kaluga lasted from December 1606 to the beginning of May 1607. In the second most important center of the uprising, Tula, was the "prince" Peter.

The failure of Vasily Shuisky's attempt to complete the defeat of the Bolotnikov uprising with one blow showed that, despite the defeat near Moscow, the forces of the rebels were far from broken. Therefore, while continuing the struggle against the main forces of Bolotnikov near Kaluga, the Shuisky government is simultaneously taking measures to suppress the uprising in other areas.

The struggle near Kaluga ended in May 1607 with a battle on the Pchelna River, where Shuisky's troops were utterly defeated and fled. The defeat of Shuisky's troops and the lifting of the siege of Kaluga meant a huge success for the Bolotnikov uprising. This led to a sharp conflict between the tsar and the boyars, who demanded the abdication of Vasily Shuisky.

After the defeat of Shuisky's troops at Pchelna and the lifting of the siege from Kaluga, Bolotnikov withdrew to Tula and united there with the "tsarevich" Peter.

During this time, Shuisky managed to gather new forces and reach a temporary agreement between the main groups of the ruling class - the boyars and nobles.

The support of the nobility was received by Shuisky through a number of activities. One of the most important among them was legislation on the peasant question. The case of detecting fugitive peasants as a result of the contradictory legislation of Boris Godunov and False Dmitry I was in a very confused state. Because of the runaway peasants, there was a sharp struggle between the landowners. The code of March 9, 1607, which was the main legislative act of the Shuisky government on the issue of peasants, had as its goal the suppression of peasant transitions from one landowner to another. The Code established a 15-year period for the search for runaway peasants. The publication of this law met the requirements of landowners and, above all, landowners. It was supposed to entail the cessation of a sharp struggle over runaway peasants between individual groups of landowners, and, consequently, to unite them to fight Bolotnikov. Shuisky's legislation, while strengthening serfdom, worsened the position of the peasants. Shuisky's policy towards peasants and serfs was subordinated to the goals of suppressing the Bolotnikov uprising.

On May 21, 1607, Vasily Shuisky launched a new campaign against Bolotnikov and "Prince" Peter, who had established themselves in Tula. In Serpukhov, the troops intended for the siege of Tula were concentrated, led by the tsar himself. The first meeting of the tsarist troops with the detachments of Bolotnikov took place on the river Eight and ended in the defeat of the rebels. The battle on the Voronya River (7 km from Tula) was also unsuccessful for Bolotnikov. Shuisky began the siege of Tula, the four-month defense of which was the final stage in the history of the Bolotnikov uprising.

Despite the numerical superiority of Shuisky's troops, the besieged courageously defended Tula, repelling all enemy assaults. In autumn, the besiegers built a dam on the Upa River, which caused a flood. Water flooded the cellar with ammunition in Tula, spoiled the grain and salt reserves. But the position of Vasily Shuisky near Tula was difficult. In the country there was an ongoing struggle between peasants and serfs. A new impostor appeared who declared himself "Tsar Dmitry" in the city of Starodub-Seversky. This adventurer, promoted by Polish feudal lords hostile to the Russian state, made extensive use of social demagoguery, promising the peasants and serfs "liberty". The name of "Tsar Dmitry" initially attracted the broad masses of the people to the impostor. In September 1607, False Dmitry II began a campaign from Starodub to Bryansk.

Under these conditions, Shuisky undertook negotiations with the defenders of Tula on surrender, promising to save the lives of the besieged. The exhausted garrison of Tula surrendered on October 10, 1607, believing the false promises of the king. The fall of Tula was the end of the Bolotnikov uprising. Encased in iron, Bolotnikov and the "tsarevich" Peter were taken to Moscow.

Immediately upon the return of Vasily Shuisky to Moscow, "Tsarevich" Peter was hanged. Shuisky decided to deal with the true leader of the uprising, Ivan Bolotnikov, only six months after the capture of Tula. Ivan Bolotnikov was sent to Kargopol and there in 1608 he was first blinded and then drowned.

The historical significance of the uprising of Ivan Bolotnikov. The Bolotnikov uprising, which covered a vast territory, is the first peasant war in Russia. The serfs were the main driving force behind the uprising. The reasons that caused it were rooted in the relations that existed between the peasantry and the feudal landowners. The Bolotnikov uprising dates back to the time of a sharp increase in the feudal exploitation of the peasantry, the legalization of serfdom. The implementation of the goals of the peasants and the lower classes of the settlement, who rebelled under the leadership of Bolotnikov, could lead to significant social changes in the life of the country, to the elimination of the feudal system.

The peasant uprisings of the era of feudalism (including the uprising of Bolotnikov) were spontaneous. This was expressed, in particular, in the fact that the rebels did not have a program for the reorganization of society. They sought to destroy the existing feudal system, but did not know how to build a new one. Instead, they put forward the slogan of replacing one king with another. The absence of a clear program limited the task of the movement to the struggle against specific carriers of oppression in one locality or another, without establishing any strong connection between the various centers of the uprising, and caused the organizational weakness of the movement. The absence of a class capable of leading this movement, overcoming its spontaneous character, working out a program for the movement and giving it organizational strength, determined the very outcome of the uprising. Neither the courage of the participants in the uprising, nor the talents of the leaders could eliminate its weaknesses, due to the very nature of the uprising.

The great merit of the rebels in 1606 was that they launched the first peasant war in Russia against feudal oppression.

False Dmitry II. Tushino camp. The Tushino camp is the residence of False Dmitry II and the "betrothed patriarch Filaret" at the confluence of the Skhodnya river with Moscow in the former village of Tushino. When in n. IN 1607 the troops of False Dmitry II approached Moscow, the Muscovites did not believe this man and were not allowed into the city. Therefore, he camped in the village of Tushino (17 km from the Kremlin), robbing the surrounding villages and royal carts (for which he received his name "Tushino thief"). Almost at the same time, Hetman Sapega Ya.'s detachments began an unsuccessful 16-month siege of the Trinity-Sergius Monastery (23 SN 1608-12 JAN 1610), trying to take the city into a complete encirclement. Part of the capital's nobility went over from Shuisky V.I. to a new contender for the throne. In Tushino, its own Boyar Duma and orders began to operate. Having captured Rostov in 1608 OK, the Polish detachments captured Metropolitan Philaret Romanov and, having brought him to Tushino, proclaimed him a patriarch. After the conclusion of a truce with Poland in IL 1608 for 3 years and 11 months, Marina Mnishek was released. She moved to the Tushino camp.

The impostor promised her three thousand rubles. and income and 14 Russian cities after accession to Moscow. And she recognized him as her husband. According to the truce, an exchange of prisoners took place. Sigismund III pledged not to support the Pretender, but the Poles remained in the Tushino camp. During this period, a regime of anarchy was established in the country. The Tushino detachments controlled a significant territory of the Russian state, robbing and ruining the population. In the Tushino camp itself, the impostor was completely controlled by the leaders of the Polish detachments. Their robbery actions caused an armed rebuff from the surrounding peasants and townspeople. The camp existed until False Dmitry II died under unclear circumstances. Shuisky V.I. to save the besieged Smolensk ended in failure. The army sent to the rescue near the village of Klushino on 3 ID 1610 was defeated by the Polish hetman Zholkevsky S. False Dmitry II again approached Moscow. In 1618, near Tushino, near the village of Spas, the Polish prince Vladislav camped, trying to seize the Moscow throne. In modern times, weapons were often found on the territory of the camp and in the surrounding area - sabers, spears, reeds, remnants of chain mail, arrows, cannonballs, lead bullets, axes, sickles, hammers, coins, special three-pointed pointed "cats", the so-called. "garlic" that dug into horse hooves. New finds appear here during earthworks.

Printers are configured through the menu File->Print Options.., in which the printer is selected and its properties are set.

For quick printing to the printer, use the button with its stylized image on the toolbar - immediately after clicking on it, the document will be printed.

Sometimes you need to print a document to a non-default printer or with special settings. To do this, use the menu item File->Print... or keyboard shortcut Control+P; in the dialog that opens, select the printer to be printed on and, by clicking on the button Properties, set its properties.

Perhaps, before printing, you would like to see on the screen how the document will look on paper. To do this, you can use the menu item File->View page in print. The document will be non-editable and tools for setting view properties will appear on the toolbar.

The first four tools are used to navigate through the pages being viewed: the first and second scroll one page to the left or right, respectively; the third and fourth tools are used to view the beginning and end of the document.

Next come the tools for setting the number of viewing pages on one screen: two/four pages and calling the viewing settings dialog, in which you can specify the required number of rows and columns into which the screen will be divided.

Next are the tools for viewing the document in full screen and printing the preview. The button for full-screen viewing of the document removes the menu, toolbars, scrollbars and leaves only the viewing panel. The next two buttons allow you to print the document and set viewing options, respectively.

The last tool on this toolbar is used to return the editor to normal mode.

Brochure printing

You can print a document with two pages on each side of a sheet of paper, arranging them so that when the printed pages are folded down the middle, the pages are in the correct order to form a booklet or brochure.

To print a booklet on a single-sided printer:

  1. Plan your document so that it looks good when printed at half size (choose the appropriate margins, font size, and so on). Complete File > Print. In the window Seal click Properties and make sure the printer is set to the same orientation (portrait or landscape) as defined in the page setup for your document. (Orientation doesn't usually matter, but it does matter for brochures.)
  2. Click Options. In chapter Pages window Print Options, select Brochure and Right pages. Click OK twice to print the first side of each page.
  3. Turn the pages over and put them in the printer, new side up and in the correct orientation. You may need to experiment a bit to find out what is the correct position for your printer.
  4. Click File > Print and than Properties to make sure the printer settings remain correct.
  5. Click again Options. In chapter Pages window Options print select Brochure and Left pages. Click OK twice to print the second side.
  6. If your printer can do double-sided printing, then set it to print both left and right pages along with booklet printing and it should work the same to match them.

Recently there was a work-related need to print text material typed in LibreOffice Writer in the form of a brochure. In principle, the idea itself was clear to me, but I had no idea how to implement it. I won’t say anything new, but as usual, Google helped me.

So, let's say that we have already created a document. I had a document in A4 format with a portrait (vertical) orientation.

It is advisable to number the pages. For this we go to Format - Page - Footer and check the box next to "On. footer".

Now File - Print - Page Layout. Select item - Brochure.

Click Properties. In the window that opens, select Paper size - A4 and Page orientation - landscape, in my case Landscape. In other printers, of course, the settings window will be different, but I think the meaning is clear.

Now you can click OK and the print will start. But it is worth remembering that you need to submit one sheet at a time. The first page has been printed, and the same page must be inserted into the printer again, but with the back, clean side. And so on until all the pages have been printed. Of course, printers can support duplex printing and some models can print all pages first on one side and then on the other side. But these are details. For me, the main thing was to understand the process itself. As a result, the entire document was printed with the correct page layout to create a booklet.

Somehow I needed to organize a double-sided printing of a document. It turned out that in OO this is not as intuitively easy to do as in many other applications. Googled it. Here is the result

Duplex printing in OpenOffice

From: Valentin Davydov
From: "Leizer Karabin" A.

0300 It's not even a bummer for me to list the pages I need, separated by commas
EG in the print dialog. The problem is that it is necessary that even sheets of EG
were printed in reverse order, otherwise they will have to be manually
EG shuffle

DTP-shniks have long solved the problem: another or receiving tray (pack in
reverse order or lies), even and odd change the order of printing,
first type even or vice versa.

al in the more OOo new ones has "print in reverse". how to time
al double-sided printing is the most it.

It is unlikely that Evgeny has an inkjet or a matrix, but everyone has laser
a drawstring that allows you to take pages face 1,2, .. up or down.
Not everyone. for example, K at ML-2015/2510/2570 (aka Phaser 3117/3122/3125)
Although no. older models already natively know how to postscript.
the third A is not given. And it is hardly more complicated than software tricks.
It is more difficult than software tricks - to make it so that the printer takes exactly from the pack
one Val.
sheet. Dove.
--- ifmail v.2.15dev5.4
* Origin: Demos online (2:5020/400) service

It's no secret that practically the only office suite that is able to withstand MS office, is an openoffice.

This office suite has its own advantages, but since is based on somewhat different principles, then users who are accustomed to MS office sometimes it is quite difficult to predict how this or that possibility is realized in openoffice(even if the implementation in the latter is much more elegant and convenient).

One of the tasks, the solution of which is very simple, is printing a brochure in Open Office Writer. Considering that Windows users usually solve this problem using the printer tools (in the print settings), and not all printers have this function, then this instruction will be useful for users openoffice in Windows.

1. In order for our brochure to have symmetrical (mirror) margins (both internal and external), you must select the mirror markup in the page properties.

This dialog box can be accessed either through the menu " Format > Page» and tab « Page", or through the context menu called by the right mouse button on the text (item " Page«).

In field " Page layout» choose « Mirrored«.

Attention: if your printer cuts off the bottom of the page, for example 1.5 cm, then set the outer margin with a margin (about 2.25 cm) to avoid “cutting off” the text on the left (because when printing, the bottom of the A4 sheet will be the left pages of the brochure) . This problem is usually relevant for inkjet printers(except models that support borderless printing).

It should be noted that this is where the changes to the document itself ended, and subsequent settings relate only to the printing option and do not affect the structure of the document, while in MS Word the setting of the “brochure” parameters for already finished document turns into a disaster (in this case, the page parameters are changed to A5 size, which entails the need to reduce the font, tables, graphs, objects, etc.). In this situation, OpenOffice Writer puts MS Word on both sides.

2. Go to the menu item "File - Printer Settings"(or immediately "File - Print").

3. Button "Properties" open a dialog box where on the tab "Paper", in field "Orientation", select "Landscape" (landscape), those. opposite to ours.

In the event that your brochure was originally laid out in landscape format (well, what if!) you must choose "Portrait".

Click OK.

If your printer supports duplex (two-sided) printing , then the document is ready for printing, otherwise follow the instructions below.

4. We return to step 2, where we now choose "Options".